![]() |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4245170)
I`m really wishing my boat had steps right now, damn you guys!
|
I know I will get bashed for this, but I'm not sure the speeds of stepped hulls increase as much as everyone on here thinks/says. Most of the non steps in question are side by side, heavy glass boats. The stepped hulls everyone likes to compare these older boats to have full stagger, lighter material hulls, usually with more hydro-dynamic lowers.........this combination also allows for "tricker" props as well. Never mind the ocean we boat in here in the northeast. I think I understand part of what the steps are doing. Not the least of which is to aerate the bottom. If you are out on a nice glass body of water there is no doubt in my mind the steps will help. But the real world around here with the chopped up water, waves coming at several directions, etc. not so much. Just my opinion!
|
Originally Posted by benjen
(Post 4245226)
I know I will get bashed for this, but I'm not sure the speeds of stepped hulls increase as much as everyone on here thinks/says. Most of the non steps in question are side by side, heavy glass boats. The stepped hulls everyone likes to compare these older boats to have full stagger, lighter material hulls, usually with more hydro-dynamic lowers.........this combination also allows for "tricker" props as well. Never mind the ocean we boat in here in the northeast. I think I understand part of what the steps are doing. Not the least of which is to aerate the bottom. If you are out on a nice glass body of water there is no doubt in my mind the steps will help. But the real world around here with the chopped up water, waves coming at several directions, etc. not so much. Just my opinion!
|
Herb is spoiled, his straight bottom sutphen with 1000's runs 112, I get what he's saying though, 9000 lb top gun straight bottom vs 9000 lb stepped top gun both with 600's what's the speeds?
|
Originally Posted by CIG3
(Post 4245062)
I agree that the 33 Power PLay is an awesome boat but to compare top speeds to a 38 Top Gun is apples and oranges. There is about 3k difference in weight. Comparing the Top Gun to the 38 Power Play would be more fair.
A 525 38 PP runs 82-84 w/generator/a/c/flat screen tv. With 700's it is a high 90's boat (only one exists and it was built as a 525 boat new). |
How is that far off from a top gun?
|
Originally Posted by lil red
(Post 4245375)
How is that far off from a top gun?
|
I see, just doesn't seem that far off from a gun that runs 88-90 with basic cabin and 525's.
|
Originally Posted by lil red
(Post 4245260)
Herb is spoiled, his straight bottom sutphen with 1000's runs 112, I get what he's saying though, 9000 lb top gun straight bottom vs 9000 lb stepped top gun both with 600's what's the speeds?
|
I didn't read this whole thread but "Out of Control" Lip-Ship 38 w/750 tunnel rammed N/A Zuls ran just over 105. Rumor was it ran near 110 but ya know how rumors are! :D
|
Originally Posted by benjen
(Post 4245226)
I know I will get bashed for this, but I'm not sure the speeds of stepped hulls increase as much as everyone on here thinks/says. Most of the non steps in question are side by side, heavy glass boats. The stepped hulls everyone likes to compare these older boats to have full stagger, lighter material hulls, usually with more hydro-dynamic lowers.........this combination also allows for "tricker" props as well. Never mind the ocean we boat in here in the northeast. I think I understand part of what the steps are doing. Not the least of which is to aerate the bottom. If you are out on a nice glass body of water there is no doubt in my mind the steps will help. But the real world around here with the chopped up water, waves coming at several directions, etc. not so much. Just my opinion!
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a3LMeoDSglY |
Originally Posted by cig92
(Post 4245424)
There's almost a 20 mph difference. Straight bottom vs ts tg with 600's, mid 70's to mid 90's. As for the 38 pp, it is the same bottom as a 388 slingshot. They got sued over that years ago, probably why they are no longer around.
Like I said a TS 500efi boat is low 80's. Our boat does 70 on a good day. Thats about 10-14 mph difference. I don't think stepped hull efficiency increases with speed but I could be wrong. |
Originally Posted by Donziben
(Post 4244782)
That boat is not for sale that I know of. I think the OP was asking about an'04 with that power. Is the OP Darr?
|
Originally Posted by 1MOSES1
(Post 4245438)
Not trying to argue your point but from what I hear from several people in my area who own TG ts's with 525's (570hp) bravo boats they are lucky to see 88. I don't see how 600's get you to mid 90's? Just think the 20 mph comparison is a bit of a stretch.
Like I said a TS 500efi boat is low 80's. Our boat does 70 on a good day. Thats about 10-14 mph difference. I don't think stepped hull efficiency increases with speed but I could be wrong. |
03 with 525's, xr's with its, 6 people full of fuel, tools gear etc 84, light 2 people 88, the owner once got it to 90 on fumes perfect conditions.
|
Originally Posted by lil red
(Post 4245514)
03 with 525's, xr's with its, 6 people full of fuel, tools gear etc 84, light 2 people 88, the owner once got it to 90 on fumes perfect conditions.
|
Only thing I know for sure is that after a season with the 750's, you'd wish they were 1100's. rinse, repeat.
|
Originally Posted by cig92
(Post 4245253)
I have to disagree with you. The numbers I posted are real life gps numbers, I have nothing to gain by inflating them. It was a 2002 38 tg,heavy side by side glass boat that ran over 100. Can't help it if you don't like/believe the numbers but they are what they are. For a comparison, my glass 37 ol, side by side 600 hp ran 94 gps and my first 92 Kevlar 38 cig with hawk 600 ran 73, do the math. There is no comparison when it comes to steps in a boat. You can say what you want about chopped up water but it still doesn't do what steps do
|
Originally Posted by lil red
(Post 4245514)
03 with 525's, xr's with its, 6 people full of fuel, tools gear etc 84, light 2 people 88, the owner once got it to 90 on fumes perfect conditions.
after reading this thread, the speed disparity seems as though it's more a function of weight than steps. I'd venture a guess that if our 94 500 efi boat weighed 2000lbs less we'd be around 72-73 which cuts the gap even more between a stepped boat and flat boat (10 mph). With that you lose almost half the cabin and the lighter layup t/s's from what Ive seen have cracks around the cowling and engine bay. |
Do we not have any 38 TS staggered vs non staggered w bravos and 525s to end the debate on how much the stagger adds?
I suspect that the answer to the OP is that you would have a 100 mph boat on a 750 hp TS 38 bravo boat. |
4 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by benjen
(Post 4245534)
I'm not sure I really want to get into this, but here goes. I never commented on any particular boats speed. So, your comment about the 2002 Top Gun running over 100 wasn't an issue with me. My comment concerned the gains from steps........apples to apples. You mention the 37 Outerlimits with steps, side by side 600's and the 38 Cigarette with 600 hawks. 21 mph faster with steps! I find that hard to believe that we are talking apples to apples there. Was the horsepower the same? Were the drives the same? Were the props the same?
My 93' Top Gun had 875HP, 3A drives, Perfect Setup from LIPSHIP and TNT. I had 1.62 ratio drives spinning 17.75x31 4 blade props. I ran around 97-98. Heavy Top Gun. My TS Playboy has twin 500 EFI which make 570-580 on the DYNO. The boat runs 88-89mph. Uses much less gas. And the 35 playboy has no transom notch like the TS GUN. I am a believer, the TS is just more efficient. Based on my numbers we are talking 600HP more to run 8MPH faster. That's not economical no matter how you skin it |
Originally Posted by cig92
(Post 4245253)
I have to disagree with you. The numbers I posted are real life gps numbers, I have nothing to gain by inflating them. It was a 2002 38 tg,heavy side by side glass boat that ran over 100. Can't help it if you don't like/believe the numbers but they are what they are. For a comparison, my glass 37 ol, side by side 600 hp ran 94 gps and my first 92 Kevlar 38 cig with hawk 600 ran 73, do the math. There is no comparison when it comes to steps in a boat. You can say what you want about chopped up water but it still doesn't do what steps do
I'm not arguing the numbers. Maybe the OL steps are more efficient than cigs. |
The 99 F2 straight bottom with no cabin but weighs about the same as a new TS, with a cabin, ran 78.4 with 500EFI's and bravos.
A TS 38 with 500EFI's and bravos runs low 80's. So, same weight, same power, one has steps, one doesn't and it's maybe 4-5 mph. Richie Powers who was around Cig when the steps were put on the boat also confirmed this, and said the real speed gains were from shaving weight and X dimension/prop technology. |
Originally Posted by cigrocket
(Post 4245551)
Kevin rigged the both of the above boats with the same power. He had the 600's in the Outerlimits Stilleto, Pulled them out and put them in the Kevlar Layed up Cig. These were his numbers, real proven numbers. The drives on the Outerlimits were Xr's I believe and the Hawk has 3's. So if you want to say 5 MPH for Trans weight and drives, that is the only real difference. Cig92 also is a driver and was just giving his experience based on facts. No reason to lie or fabricate.
My 93' Top Gun had 875HP, 3A drives, Perfect Setup from LIPSHIP and TNT. I had 1.62 ratio drives spinning 17.75x31 4 blade props. I ran around 97-98. Heavy Top Gun. My TS Playboy has twin 500 EFI which make 570-580 on the DYNO. The boat runs 88-89mph. Uses much less gas. And the 35 playboy has no transom notch like the TS GUN. I am a believer, the TS is just more efficient. Based on my numbers we are talking 600HP more to run 8MPH faster. That's not economical no matter how you skin it |
Originally Posted by 1MOSES1
(Post 4245540)
is that Gordon's? If so does he have boxes or shortys? might explain some of the difference.
after reading this thread, the speed disparity seems as though it's more a function of weight than steps. I'd venture a guess that if our 94 500 efi boat weighed 2000lbs less we'd be around 72-73 which cuts the gap even more between a stepped boat and flat boat (10 mph). With that you lose almost half the cabin and the lighter layup t/s's from what Ive seen have cracks around the cowling and engine bay. |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4245573)
Every 1000lbs is good for 3mph. Most of the 90`s Cig. had 1/2 cabins, I`d agree weight is the biggest factor
|
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4245573)
Every 1000lbs is good for 3mph. Most of the 90`s Cig. had 1/2 cabins, I`d agree weight is the biggest factor
|
Originally Posted by drpete3
(Post 4245547)
Do we not have any 38 TS staggered vs non staggered w bravos and 525s to end the debate on how much the stagger adds?
I suspect that the answer to the OP is that you would have a 100 mph boat on a 750 hp TS 38 bravo boat. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4245517)
wow, maybe something was off in my buddys boat... not sure...
[ATTACH=CONFIG]535344[/ATTACH] |
That's because once you hit 88, you time travel. You just don't remember it.....
|
Originally Posted by lil red
(Post 4245260)
Herb is spoiled, his straight bottom sutphen with 1000's runs 112, I get what he's saying though, 9000 lb top gun straight bottom vs 9000 lb stepped top gun both with 600's what's the speeds?
|
Going off what I recall from his last trip out. Gps on Benjamin's phone. He did a few things and picked up over 500 rpm. That might have been 108. Are you the sutphen gps police? Seems like your trolling everyone's speed claim?
|
Originally Posted by lil red
(Post 4245656)
Going off what I recall from his last trip out. Gps on Benjamin's phone. He did a few things and picked up over 500 rpm. That might have been 108. Are you the sutphen gps police? Seems like your trolling everyone's speed claim?
|
[QUOTE=sutphen 30;4245663],his best was 107 as reported to us.
107 was a "reported" fact too?? Anybody actually SEE a GPS number? |
Well I'll make sure I don't post anything to make lite or a joke and make sure we stick strictly to the facts. God forbid somebody doesn't look up exact fact when making a joke
|
Originally Posted by lil red
(Post 4245666)
Well I'll make sure I don't post anything to make lite or a joke and make sure we stick strictly to the facts. God forbid somebody doesn't look up exact fact when making a joke
now wheres my feeler gauge.:bong: |
[QUOTE=kreed;4245665]
Originally Posted by sutphen 30
(Post 4245663)
,his best was 107 as reported to us.
107 was a "reported" fact too?? Anybody actually SEE a GPS number? |
Whoa. Calm down. I do have the GPS image on my e-mail. I do not know how to post it. I would be happy to e-mail it to Billy, Kreed, whoever. It was 107.2. What was said was that we did this in some pretty nasty water. The boat was still climbing when the water we were rapidly approaching was getting worse. So, I let off. In defense of Jamie I did say that 110 was pretty much in my reach on that run. Also, I said to Jamie we were trimmed "safe", which is how I run the boat. If I ran the boat on the edge of disaster there was probably another 2 mph. That is where he got the 112. I'm pretty proud of what we accomplished with this boat. If it never runs faster than 107 that is still 7 mph faster than any of you clowns said it would go!
|
clown,,your the clown that said he run in any water w/ anyone.looks like you'd get your clown azz handed to you by 700hp OL's.Then there may be an Apache or 2 that will send you back to the clown car.so your winter project is to cut some steps in that tub.:D:D either that,,drive it over Niagra,,that should get you to 112mph.:D
hey,I need to bring back that carb body to you.give me a call,,you clown :D |
I love winter.:duel:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.