Opening Statements Begin In Gratton Lawsuit Trial
#31
Would you expect the insurance company to try an renege on payment if Carbonell is found to hire unqualified personnel? If you hire an unlicensed driver to drive your car then they would attempt to renege on paying any claim. Because it is a significant dollar amount involved you know the insurance company would want to take evasive action on paying.
#35
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: East Texas Waterfront- running errands if anyone asks
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Would you expect the insurance company to try an renege on payment if Carbonell is found to hire unqualified personnel? If you hire an unlicensed driver to drive your car then they would attempt to renege on paying any claim. Because it is a significant dollar amount involved you know the insurance company would want to take evasive action on paying.
At this point it would be safe to assume that one or both parties to the suit thinks this is a slam dunk, or that settlement and subrogation attempts have failed, and they have no other recourse but to fight all claims.
#36
Registered
There is no way for this to end well... No waiver in the world will stop a grieving family as well as high powered attorneys from coming after every last collectible entity in line.
It's sad he died. He was far to young to leave us. The sport of offshore racing is in big trouble. If it's not political issues or sanctioning bodies, it's racers, or lawyers, or something..
Sad indeed... Like i said.. no way for this to end well.
Tom
It's sad he died. He was far to young to leave us. The sport of offshore racing is in big trouble. If it's not political issues or sanctioning bodies, it's racers, or lawyers, or something..
Sad indeed... Like i said.. no way for this to end well.
Tom
#37
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are YOU kidding??? Insurance Co. will try anything to get out of paying a big claim. NOTE, I said big clam...They are scum, they take your money, and when it comes time to pay, they fight to the death with there even lower legal teams... That is why there are so many civil suits...Insurance Co. try to weasel, yes weasel out of paying. Even if they can delay paying.. they do.
#40
Registered
I have no dog in this fight, but I did some racing back in the 80's. I have a few "legal" oriented questions, and I am by no means SBI or Carbonell advocate. (I will restrain my comments RE; Carbonell and SBI, it's no secret) All the respect to the Gratton family an everyone else passed in misc. incidents. However, at fault, blame and negligent issues. Not familiar with the contract that SBI provides to the racers, but in order to be legally liable, and let's face it, this is a sort of "private" endeavor and LLC, what laws were broken.? What statutes govern boat racing. I'm not questioning what should have been done, who should have done what. What was in the contract,? what was represented by SBI,? verbally which would be assurance but not contractual to the racers. Again, by no means I condone or protect SBI and things that took place. How does anyone know that something "should have happened faster" or better or by some one else? It's a tragic accident, not the first, but what laws were broken? My condolences to the families and I done the NY day Gratton run every year but this one, but these type of law suits are just BS and lawyers ego driven. I'm sure every racers knows what they getting into at the start. I would be interested to see a copy of the race contract assuring what, who, type of training etc, they are to expect. If it wasn't provided is it a breach of contract? Did SBI/Carbonell broke the law? or were they just stupid? It's a "law suit". explain the "law" part to me some one. Not want to open a can of worms and go into a debate on this, I just not sure of all this reasoning.
Last edited by PARADOX; 01-14-2015 at 01:59 PM.