Notices

Extension Boxes

Old 07-11-2015, 04:59 PM
  #1  
BUP
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
Default Extension Boxes

I am looking for ideas as I know Everett Performance and Latham Marine have 7 inch set back boxes for Bravo apps. Or least believe they do.

Winter project

I am going to build and dry sump an engine for a boat. I want to install the engine package as low as possible in the engine compartment. I do not want a 12 inch box but anything that is 6 to 8 and adjustable but for spacing the engine and drive down only. Really would like 4 inch drop but I know not possible.

The only problem is the transom is already cut and drive packages offer 3 inch shorty. So will or any extension boxes out on the market allow a 3 inch drop or if possible 4 inches from the standard X that has already been cut.

My other option is have the transom re done and cut the X as low as possible. really did not want to go that route. Anyways have to start thinking about how to go about this and what is available. THX

Last edited by BUP; 07-11-2015 at 05:02 PM.
BUP is offline  
Old 07-11-2015, 07:11 PM
  #2  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tucson,Az.
Posts: 930
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tyson Garvin can make you a custom box.
skater40 is offline  
Old 07-11-2015, 09:32 PM
  #3  
BUP
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Thanks I know Tyson but did not know he made stuff like this.

I did think of a buddy of mine who has a fab shop but does nothing boat related. The problem I would have with him is understanding exactly what I wanted the box for and how it should work. He does stuff for defense and planes plus stuff for TI.
BUP is offline  
Old 07-12-2015, 12:47 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
BigSilverCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Joplin, Mo
Posts: 2,630
Received 50 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

We can make what ever you need, give me a call

Tyson
BigSilverCat is offline  
Old 07-12-2015, 08:14 AM
  #5  
RIPSTA Racing Team
VIP Member
 
fireboatpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm going to throw my 2 cents worth into the ring. I'm far from an expert on building and gigging but I had some trouble understanding what you are trying to do. I assume that your trying to keep the engines as low as possible for lower COG? But isn't the idea of the boxes and shorties to get the prop center line up as far as possible? All the boxes I've seen either raise the drive or remain neutral. You want to drop the drive 4" lower into the water? I've re-read your post several times and that's the way I'm understanding it. Then you want to use shortie lowers to get the centerline back up? It just seems to me that custom fabing big ticket items like boxes and modifying your transom and purchasing lowers to get the prop line back to where you started isn't going to achieve any positive results other than lowering your COG. I slammed my engines as low as I could go and moved them forward about a foot on rail mounts but used Stellings boxes in the neutral position with -2 shorties. I had the prop line at 2 3/8" above the bottom but had to space it down a bit to get back some steering control. My point is that when you go changing things around that have been tried and true and WORK, it's quite expensive and sometimes a waste of time, money and effort to get a neg result. Moving the engines forward in my case was a problem. We are still working that out. Lowering the COG wasn't an issue since we went to drive shafts so it doesn't matter where the drives are. Second point is that if you can use off the shelf parts and find they don't achieve the result you want you can sell them and recoop your money at least. Buildind one off items and changing the design of your hull is a major jump. Sorry if I've gone down the wrong road here but I've learned a few things here and ther the hard expensive way. just my thoughts on your build, GOOD LUCK!
fireboatpilot is offline  
Old 07-12-2015, 11:06 AM
  #6  
BUP
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Thanks - I am looking for input as well. I understand what you are saying. That's why I posted my other option redoing the transom in which I am a poor glass person and would have to send that out. But then I lose all the stock set up just in case.

. Anyways the boat is top heavy and the motor is going to be built over the winter with no timeframe put on it. I understand all about neutral position and raising the drive higher. My post wasn't clear enough and should have stated is there boxes from neutral position to 3 inches down. The plan is to go with a 3 inch shorty drive in place of the standard bravo drive. Possible Imco drive. Also that why I mentioned I know spacing 4 inches down then going with a 3 inch shorty drive puts the propshaft / drive 1 inch deeper than before, IMO a 1 inch spacer even for the stock app might help this boat run better. Its like anything trial and error and keep on testing it to see how the results turn out.
BUP is offline  
Old 07-12-2015, 01:58 PM
  #7  
bor
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
bor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: uithoorn,the netherlands
Posts: 728
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Its what I have done whit my 21 v hull when powered it whit my ls ,I wanted the engine low as possible like you and started whit a Blackhawk drive whits is really short but turned out that my hull didn't had the natural bow lift build in that it need it so went back to a normal bravo that was far to deep .
Then I bought a imco sc -3" here from a member of the board that stepped up to imco s new scx-4 the different was incredible almost could let my hands of the wheel at 96mph !
I swapped the ls and imco out of the 21 for a normal 5.0 mpi and bravo and use the ls for my new cat that is coming the imco is for sale

I m gonna do the same whit the new cat start very high x and then space down so that engines are low as possible in the boat .
bor is offline  
Old 07-12-2015, 04:49 PM
  #8  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,516
Received 1,783 Likes on 884 Posts
Default

IMO, I think it would be easier to just fill and recut the transom than to have a custom ext box made.
Griff is offline  
Old 07-12-2015, 08:48 PM
  #9  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: dfw texas
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Ill probably get tomatos chucked at me but in certain combos , the ole land and sea stern jack can do wonders, and no glass work required . Just has to be that combo
airjunky is offline  
Old 07-12-2015, 09:28 PM
  #10  
RIPSTA Racing Team
VIP Member
 
fireboatpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,093
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've never heard of any boxes that move down. I get the COG issue, what's the thinking on pushing the props lower in the water and back with boxes? Is it a handling issue? I would try to space the lowers down if so and see if it begins to solve the issue. Spacers are the cheapest way to do that. And moving the drives back only minimal amount like 7" for the cost involved doesn't seem like a bang for the buck wise choice. If the spacers work then like Griff said then I would fill and recut the transom doing something positive on the COG and handling issues. What are the running issues besides the high COG? Doesn't make much sense to me that a 38 Sonic with respectable power should need so many major changes. Are all big Sonics top heavy? I've never had the pleasure.
fireboatpilot is offline  

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.