Converting another boater into an Arneson Believer
#82
Registered

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 340
Likes: 35
#83
There was one 600 boat. "First Born". The Ilmor F-4 was slower than the 700 boats not by the fault of the propulsion package.
#84
Registered

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 11,901
Likes: 1,138
#85
Registered

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 68
725 Ilmor's & 700 Merc's are not exact but pretty equal. With the claims you make the Arenson boat should have been faster, no? I was just asking a simple question on why it didn't seem to work as well on the Fountain. Could be many reasons, sorry for wanting to be more knowledgeable about your product. No reason to be a d*ck about it!
#86
Registered

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 68
Same here - I can't imagine a reason why a #6, as hydrodynamically efficient as they are, could be faster...
-#6 is still dragging the skeg AND the bottom half of the gear housing bullet (fairly large in diameter due to the lower gear).
-Arneson's are dragging the skeg and ONLY the bottom half of the prop shaft housing with NO gear, just a small diameter tube with bearings inside.
Should be less drag, period.
-#6 is still dragging the skeg AND the bottom half of the gear housing bullet (fairly large in diameter due to the lower gear).
-Arneson's are dragging the skeg and ONLY the bottom half of the prop shaft housing with NO gear, just a small diameter tube with bearings inside.
Should be less drag, period.
btw no one yet has called the arneson props ginsu knives yet on this thread... i love that one... like the clown thinks arnesons have different wheels than a six
#87
Registered

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 68
Whats if thats all in your mind and its actually only 97.4x better... then what you wanna fight about it... lol
#88
Registered

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 68
I thought arneson maint was hosing them off with fresh water end of season, and an occasional oil change every second leap year
#89
Registered

Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,268
Likes: 68


