Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Build a 650-700 hp engine.  N/A or blower? >

Build a 650-700 hp engine. N/A or blower?

Notices

Build a 650-700 hp engine. N/A or blower?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-17-2016, 07:09 AM
  #21  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 3,937
Received 433 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
And the stock GM bottom ends will live fine at that power level. No need for new cranks, rods, pistons, oil pans, cylinder heads, and so on.

Full force tim has probably wasted 40-50 thousand on replacing his 420hp mercs in his old cig, to make his boat go 10mph faster by going to bigger cubic inch engines. 3 years ago, he could have done a basic rebuild on his old 420s, a cam upgrade , slapped a 250 blower on them, and made his 630hp he just made with his new engines, with alot of gas money leftover.
Ouch, sad but true.

Just for clarification; I have also spent alot of money on stupid boat stuff, so you're not alone Timmay.
frickstyle is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 07:29 AM
  #22  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
cigrocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Endicott, NY
Posts: 2,576
Received 159 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fatherb68
Also depends what drive. A bravo xr is way over powered as it is with 650-700 hp. Now add the torque of a blower
I Disagree, Blower Motor 700HP range is easier on the drive then a NA 540-598CI Engine. N/A with those cubes are stump pullers with tons of torque. Compare a DYNO Sheet from a 454-509 with a Blower on it versus a 540-598CI NA. Look at the Torque numbers and what RPM that torque is being made. NA make big torque throughout the RPM bands that most of us consistently boat at like ( Cruising speed). Blower Motors are only making that big torque when you have the sticks on the dash and making the boost. Either packages can be reliable. Just my 2 cents
cigrocket is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 09:02 AM
  #23  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 503
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

It's better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it, so what are you waiting for? http://teaguecustommarine.com/em0011...lue-34973.html.
30ftpanther is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 09:20 AM
  #24  
SORE MEMBER
Platinum Member
 
Wobble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 29°50'49.74"N 95° 5'17.55"W.......TEXAS
Posts: 6,989
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Build or buy something designed in the last twenty years http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive/...rcharged.shtml

Supercharged LS 416 (720 HP & 695 TQ)
Wobble is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 10:54 AM
  #25  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: naples,florida
Posts: 4,114
Received 597 Likes on 242 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
And the stock GM bottom ends will live fine at that power level. No need for new cranks, rods, pistons, oil pans, cylinder heads, and so on.

Full force tim has probably wasted 40-50 thousand on replacing his 420hp mercs in his old cig, to make his boat go 10mph faster by going to bigger cubic inch engines. 3 years ago, he could have done a basic rebuild on his old 420s, a cam upgrade , slapped a 250 blower on them, and made his 630hp he just made with his new engines, with alot of gas money leftover.
That's the info I was looking for earlier . Ty
tommymonza is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 11:04 AM
  #26  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Once you go blower, it's hard to go back to NA. The torque diffrence is night and day and if you like a seat of the pants feeling, it's hard to beat. Blowers gerenally pull until the sticks can't be pushed forward anymore while that last 500 rpm in a NA takes a little bit to get there.

If I was starting from scratch I'd probably build a NA engine in that power range because it would be a lot less expensive than having to buy a pair (in your case 3) blowers. If I was working with what I had, I might go a totally different direction.
Panther is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 11:16 AM
  #27  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Metamora MI
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Procharged with a Bravo XZ drive may be the most economical. Boost/Torque does not come on till 2500 ish Rpm. By that time hopefully your on plane.
hadleycat is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 12:15 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dayton, OH/Burnside KY
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Build a blown LS motor. Get the same power out of a much much lighter package!!! Plus they sound plain SICK!!! Heck, my N/A LS boat motor that is pretty mild made just shy of 600.
corey331 is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 12:44 PM
  #29  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Lake George, NY
Posts: 1,244
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Forget the Bravo, The question was NA or Blown, And when the water is really rough. Torque is where its at, Not Horsepower.
So the answer is Cubic Inches NA
class6 is offline  
Old 02-17-2016, 07:37 PM
  #30  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
jeff32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St-Hyacinthe, quebec, canada
Posts: 7,731
Received 372 Likes on 250 Posts
Default

great info here guys! I see for base big low end torq N/A is probably the way to go till cruise speed without hammering, and if you want the fastest to top speed, blower will pull all the way up till max rpm

nice info!

BUT !

None answered to the question, apple to apple in HP, do they cost the same to build?

again, I'm not repowering, just discussion for my curiosity! and maybe others curiosity too!
jeff32 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.