Like Tree0Likes

36ft Skater At Over 100mph

Reply
Old 10-12-2002, 09:00 PM
  #21
Registered
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Niskayuna, NY
My Boats: 2009 FORMULA 292
Posts: 5,543
Default

John B,

The ONLY way I will disagree with you respectfully is to get a ride in that bad boy next summer! Hey, I have to go with what you say...YOU have a 36 I have only a 24 and can only speak from what I have on read from Skater. So, therefore, I will concede to you, an OWNER of a 36!
Shane is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 09:19 PM
  #22
Registered
 
John B's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Amherst,NY
My Boats: 36 skater
Posts: 520
Default Shane

I keep the boat in Buffalo. We had it in the Thousand Islands Poker Run in 2000 and 2001. I would be happy to give you a ride.

JB
John B is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 11:41 PM
  #23
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 372
Default

I think we are in agreement on everything except that the bigger gears and shafts in the "drysump" 6 cause more hp loss. I "know" that this isn't true. With the BW tranny the MC6 may be a wash to a slight hp loss disadvantage. Also the hp loss in drives is rpm sensitive. As you start turning the r's up above the normal 5200-5400, the MC6 gets a clear advantage over the Bravo (of course, how many are turning over 6000rpm with a Bravo!). Weight and drag are the main culprits. Think of how many people you could put in your boat to make up the difference in weight( about 425lbs per side). A huge skeg and props designed for 1000hp don't help!
As for racing, acceleration is really a huge drag problem. You are carrying an extra 1000 lbs to accelerate up to speed (is this the APBA number?), now that the boat is lower in the water, the full MC6 gearcase is dragging as well as more boat because of the extra weight, and now you have to accelerate up those massive props which might hookup too well at lower speeds which hold the engines down from peak torque rpm a little longer. If the intent of the APBA weight number is to keep the "boat" weight the same for safety purposes, why not allow lab finishing a standard prop to some spec and allow SCS lockout trannies (which also weigh less than BW's so the weight spec could change accordingly)?
I have heard comments that these boats handle at speed better with 6's, probably because of the skeg. Along with a huge improvement in reliability, it could be the choice for more if it were just a little closer in max speed. I don't think that it's really that far off, but to some a couple of mph is too much, especially when it costs more to go slower (although it's probably made up for in resale value and peace of mind).
Falcon is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bernm3
Baja
5
05-25-2006 12:28 PM
kubcat
General Q & A
12
02-28-2006 06:27 AM
DiamondPerformance
Skater
7
10-05-2004 02:04 PM
Ike
General Boating Discussion
11
01-10-2004 06:30 PM
29scarab
General Boating Discussion
40
10-16-2002 12:15 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 PM.


Copyright 2011 OffShoreOnly. All rights reserved.