Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Manufacturer's model length claims >

Manufacturer's model length claims

Notices

Manufacturer's model length claims

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-16-2018, 06:06 AM
  #11  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Too Stroked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,964
Received 179 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

Making a hull where the LOA is longer than the running surface is an age old trick to get higher top speeds. And although Reggie takes a lot of heat for the practice, he's certainly not the only one - nor the biggest offender. Anybody look at an old Hydrostream for instance? Their running surface to LOA ratio makes Reggie look like a Girl Scout.

But a boat that incorporates this design / marketing practice also faces some other challenges. For instance, most marinas charge for dock space, detailing, shrink wrap, etc. based on LOA. So your 44' boat that in reality is more like 40' long will cost you a pretty penny on certain services. Just a thought.
Too Stroked is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 07:04 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,286
Received 793 Likes on 448 Posts
Default

it all comes down to thorough research and comparing apples to apples for your own end expectations.

Just food for thought, a C5000 Mystic is 50+' from sponson tip to Rudder post (LOA) but the running surface is 43' AND Skater has been giving length and stretch in their model designations... no one questions this but it can be confusing as hell to someone that has a perceived understanding of boat dimensions and looking to fit a new(er) into an existing slip/lift or building opening.
speicher lane is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 07:52 AM
  #13  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ankeny,ia.
Posts: 4,036
Received 224 Likes on 129 Posts
Default

Does putting a regular hot dog on a foot long bun make it a foot long ?
JaayTeee is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 08:56 AM
  #14  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,828
Received 1,195 Likes on 519 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JaayTeee
Does putting a regular hot dog on a foot long bun make it a foot long ?
Nope, but throwing any size hot dog down a hallway doesn’t really matter anyhow.
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 10:43 AM
  #15  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 955
Received 792 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

I bet the DW team doesn't call it a 44 when they go to race it in Super Cat next year with SBI. Funny how it will fit in the class rules of 42' maximum length for the class.
Skater30 is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 11:03 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,797
Received 151 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Skater30
I bet the DW team doesn't call it a 44 when they go to race it in Super Cat next year with SBI. Funny how it will fit in the class rules of 42' maximum length for the class.
So someone is really racing one of these new 44 DWs in Super cat next year? And if they are- to your point Dale, I know that there is a new 438 going to racing in that class. So how does that boat fit in to the class rules?
precisiondetails is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 11:14 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 6,651
Received 1,328 Likes on 741 Posts
Default

I have wondered the same thing about Outerlimits V hulls. I have a picture on my computer somewhere with me in the brustle that goes past me and the number 6 drives.

Thats a big extension.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 11:18 AM
  #18  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 955
Received 792 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

PBC was going to race the new canopied DW40 in Super Cat, but now that they picked up MTI, they're going to campaign an MTI instead. I don't doubt that somebody will pick up the canopied DW40 to run Super Cat with it next year. There would have to be minor changes made to a 438 in both width and length to fit into the Super Cat class as the rules sit right now - 66" max tunnel width and 42' 0" LOA.
Skater30 is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 02:13 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 164
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Too Stroked
Making a hull where the LOA is longer than the running surface is an age old trick to get higher top speeds. And although Reggie takes a lot of heat for the practice, he's certainly not the only one - nor the biggest offender. Anybody look at an old Hydrostream for instance? Their running surface to LOA ratio makes Reggie look like a Girl Scout.

But a boat that incorporates this design / marketing practice also faces some other challenges. For instance, most marinas charge for dock space, detailing, shrink wrap, etc. based on LOA. So your 44' boat that in reality is more like 40' long will cost you a pretty penny on certain services. Just a thought.
Unless you have a navy ship or a Wally of course the LOA and the LWL will always be different. It's not a trick, it's just that of a marine hull. Now the beak, bustle, a notch or a long laid out bow is a just a mere manufacturer design. LOA is used in different ways throughout the entire marine industry. Use a 42 for example, Outerlimits, Cigarette, and Fountain. The fountain looks like a toy in comparison but guess what...its a 42... Just marketing gimmicks.
JJ30 is offline  
Old 12-16-2018, 02:30 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pasadena, MD
Posts: 3,570
Received 121 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Before that it used to be the other way. My 24' is not 24 feet long and my 19' is not 19 feet long, et, etc....
f_inscreenname is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.