![]() |
I’m gonna wait for the 3rd identical thread to chime in technically again.
|
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4825623)
said no one ever and yeah don`t we all.
|
Originally Posted by Michaeloh59
(Post 4825625)
Lol. I sense skepticism. Would it help if i said Im an old man and would be quite happy with a 70 mph boat to take the Granchilrens for rides?
|
Originally Posted by sb
(Post 4825624)
i’m gonna wait for the 3rd identical thread to chime in technically again.
|
Originally Posted by underpsi68
(Post 4825626)
If that's the case, get stock 496ho's.
|
I had a 2003 496 HO with a complete raylar package installed. The stock motor was swapped at 50 hrs in 2003 with the raylar 496. When this swap was done you do a exchange with raylar for a complete ready to drop in package. The boat is still around on our lake a running as good as ever. Just routine maintenance done every year on it. It's around 700ish hrs on it last time I saw the owner.
|
1. If the boat is still available in this market there might be something wrong with it.
2. I have a set of them, they run very well. Once the original owner replaced everything (specifically forged pistons) they have very similar characteristics as Mercury 525's - they way they run are very reliable assuming the company who built them did it correctly. The cam is basically the same as the 525 and it yields roughly the same power and torque as well as the way they sound. |
Don't they require premium fuel?
|
Originally Posted by PA.WOODCHUCK
(Post 4825653)
Don't they require premium fuel?
|
Originally Posted by PA.WOODCHUCK
(Post 4825653)
Don't they require premium fuel?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.