Phenomenon
#51
Registered

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,008
Likes: 752
From: Traverse City, Michigan
#52
VIP Member

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,475
Likes: 2,099
From: SW Ohio
That's true, and makes sense; equal HP, but half again as much outdrive drag. But I don't think anybody goes from twin 750s to triple 500s, do they?
Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991
#53
Registered

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,309
Likes: 1,815
From: Merritt Island, FL
Not sure what you are saying there Brad, but if you want do a little research for real world one that is real easy would be 47 fountains.
They used to make them in triple 525’s and twin SCI700’s with NXT transmissions and Number 6 drives.
They used to make them in triple 525’s and twin SCI700’s with NXT transmissions and Number 6 drives.
#54
VIP Member

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,475
Likes: 2,099
From: SW Ohio
I'm guessing the twin is faster. Same HP (essentially), with half again the engine weight and half again the outdrive drag, the triple will fall behind. That actually makes sense. But what happens when you put triple SCI700s in it? Serious question. I would also have to guess the triple consumed more fuel. I have to wonder what the incentive was to opt for the triple. Kewl factor?
Back to my earlier point.... If I were going to build a quad turbine Mystic (a man can dream, right?) to attempt to challenge the LOTO record, it would have surface drives, which are virtually all thrust and no drag. Simple math says 12K SHP is going to crush a record set with 9K SHP (assuming they were the upgraded T55s, and not the standard 3K SHP units). Of course, this is also assuming the boat stayed on the water. Somewhere between that risk and the cost of doing so is the only reason Qatar still holds that record. As soon as somebody with enough flammable cash and big enough cajones decides it's going down, it's going down. We've seen that what it would take is mechanically feasible.
Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991
#56
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 1,135
If you guys are going to dream, dream big. Just build a 50' Mystic with a pair of Rolls Royce T-56 turbines with almost 6,000 shp, weigh just under 2,000#s and are 12' long and 27" in diameter. Have BPM custom build a set of drives capable of handling the power and Rolla build you a set of forged props. The turbines alone will set you back $5M, add another $5M for the one-off custom boat/rigging/testing and for a cool $10M you can probably go break Spirit of Qatar's record (if you live through it). I honestly don't think we'll ever see that record broken. I don't think you'll ever see somebody willing to outspend them, or that doesn't value their life enough to chase that record. Basically similar reasons we see other long standing boat speed records not broken (ultimate world speed record and outboard speed record). Interesting thread though!
#57
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 1,135
Think even smaller! Eddie Knox (owner of Problem Child, multiple time record setting and national champion TFH before he quit racing), told me he was seriously considering taking his team back to LOTO and setting the record at one time. He would've put two fuel tanks/fuel systems in the boat, one for alcohol and one for nitromethane. They would run the boat from the start to to about 3/4 track on alcohol and then for the last 1/4 they'd switch over to nitro. They could gear up from their standard drag setup and he figured they could easily break SoQ's record. Seeing as Problem Child had run over 260mph in the 1/4, running at least that speed or greater seemed an easy task, basically having as long as they wanted to gain speed. The big question would've been could they have gotten wind and water conditions that would allow their 4,000#, 7,000HP 20' Bullet hydro to run those speeds.
#58
Correspondent


Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 11,637
Likes: 4,249
Think even smaller! Eddie Knox (owner of Problem Child, multiple time record setting and national champion TFH before he quit racing), told me he was seriously considering taking his team back to LOTO and setting the record at one time. He would've put two fuel tanks/fuel systems in the boat, one for alcohol and one for nitromethane. They would run the boat from the start to to about 3/4 track on alcohol and then for the last 1/4 they'd switch over to nitro. They could gear up from their standard drag setup and he figured they could easily break SoQ's record. Seeing as Problem Child had run over 260mph in the 1/4, running at least that speed or greater seemed an easy task, basically having as long as they wanted to gain speed. The big question would've been could they have gotten wind and water conditions that would allow their 4,000#, 7,000HP 20' Bullet hydro to run those speeds.
All this discussion makes Ken Warby's 317-mph water-speed record that much more incredible.
Last edited by Matt Trulio; 11-05-2022 at 11:29 AM.
#59
Registered

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,088
Likes: 1,135
You've forgotten more about drag boat racing than I will ever know, Dale, but my answer to your final question would be no way. The course would extend the risk exposure for far too long in a tiny, massively powered 20-footer.
All this discussion makes Ken Warby's 317-mph water-speed record that much more incredible.
All this discussion makes Ken Warby's 317-mph water-speed record that much more incredible.
Last edited by Skater30; 11-05-2022 at 11:51 AM.
#60
VIP Member

Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,475
Likes: 2,099
From: SW Ohio
You've forgotten more about drag boat racing than I will ever know, Dale, but my answer to your final question would be no way. The course would extend the risk exposure for far too long in a tiny, massively powered 20-footer.
All this discussion makes Ken Warby's 317-mph water-speed record that much more incredible.
All this discussion makes Ken Warby's 317-mph water-speed record that much more incredible.
There's the challenge, isn't it? Making it the whole mile in whatever conditions Mother Nature decides to throw at you. The Mystics seem to be the vessel best suited for this.
Ken Warby was riding a rocket and skimming it across the water. Impressive, to be sure, but he wasn't propelling git with a prop in the water.
Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991


