![]() |
Originally Posted by c0ncEpT
(Post 4943490)
Except the MoTeC is 6x more powerful than a Holley. With the Holley your restricted to modifying the parameters available via their software. With the MoTec it allows you to add your own Tables, Parameters and Channels. It lets the user define how the ECU operates. That's why you see them in these applications.
Full disclosure.... My experience is with the HP, which is not even Holley's most powerful unit, and I'm not doing the tuning myself, so I'm not intimately familiar myself. I have a guy that knows the Holley stuff, and several other ECM systems, inside and out that does that for me. I've watched him work with my ECM, and he's tried explaining most of it to me as he goes. We've talked about what it will do; the functionality that it has that I'm not even remotely tapping into. Pretty sure Holley allows you to build your own tables for whatever you need and assign functions and parameters to those tables. I'm not sure why anyone would want more control than the Holley allows. I can't, for the life of me, wrap my head around the notion that Holley "restricts" anything of any use in any way. Just my 2 cents.... Thanks. Brad. |
Do any of these systems have the ability to hold RPM consistent in rough water? Essentially taking the human factor of throttling the boat out of the equation? I would think a computer would be able to react to the loading and unloading a lot faster than any human could.
|
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4943503)
Do any of these systems have the ability to hold RPM consistent in rough water? Essentially taking the human factor of throttling the boat out of the equation? I would think a computer would be able to react to the loading and unloading a lot faster than any human could.
I would think it would have to be done with ignition advance unless you incorporated DTC. I wouldn’t think you’d want to deviate that much from an ideal advance. But I do know that the Holley system has capacity for DTC. The cool thing about that is that it eliminates the need for IAC, as it’s just incorporated into DTC. Thanks. Brad. |
Motec and Holley aren't even in the same universe.
|
Originally Posted by underpsi68
(Post 4943519)
Motec and Holley aren't even in the same universe.
Key Comparison for BoatsHolley ECUs (e.g., Terminator X / Terminator X Max, HP, Dominator) are popular in the marine world for their affordability, user-friendliness, and solid performance in many boat setups. MoTeC (particularly the M1 series) is a premium, high-end option favored in professional or extreme marine racing environments.Here's a breakdown of the main differences based on user experiences, forums, and marine-specific discussions:
Bottom Line
|
Ive thought about this in the past
Originally Posted by 302Sport
(Post 4943503)
Do any of these systems have the ability to hold RPM consistent in rough water? Essentially taking the human factor of throttling the boat out of the equation? I would think a computer would be able to react to the loading and unloading a lot faster than any human could.
Understanding the ProblemIn rough water, when a boat's propellers (props) exit the water, the engine experiences a sudden loss of load, causing RPMs to spike rapidly (over-revving). Upon re-entry, the sudden torque load can stress the drivetrain, engine, and props. Manually throttling back helps, but an automated ECU solution can detect this unload condition and intervene by limiting RPM, retarding timing, cutting spark/fuel, or modulating throttle (if using drive-by-wire, DBW). Your idea of a driveshaft (or prop shaft) speed sensor is spot-on—it can detect rapid RPM acceleration (rate of change, or dRPM/dt) or mismatches between engine RPM and shaft speed, triggering protection.Both Holley and MoTeC ECUs can handle this, but MoTeC's advanced programmability makes it more flexible for custom marine strategies. Holley is more user-friendly and affordable for basic setups. Neither has a "plug-and-play" prop unload feature, but you can configure one using sensors, inputs/outputs (I/O), and logic. Always consult a professional tuner, as marine environments require waterproofing and robust wiring. General Setup Approach
Holley ECU Setup (e.g., Terminator X Max, HP, or Dominator)Holley excels in affordability and ease but lacks built-in RPM rate-of-change limiting. You can approximate it with rev limiters, advanced I/O, and custom logic. For boats, use marine-certified kits (e.g., with sealed harnesses).
MoTeC ECU Setup (e.g., M1 Series or MCM112 Marine Kit)MoTeC is premium and highly customizable, ideal for pro marine racing (e.g., Mercury outboards). The MCM112 plug-in kit for Mercury 200-500R engines supports prop speed sensors natively, making it perfect for unload detection. Use M1 Tune software for configuration.
Recommendation
|
Originally Posted by underpsi68
(Post 4943519)
Motec and Holley aren't even in the same universe.
Motec is plug and play with the DTS. Plug it in and go. Big gains on a stock engine with a pretty mild tuneup. |
MoTecs cost the same or less then a 2nd set of propellers. You will never recognize a better gain for the money, their support is incredible, and its up to you how far you choose to push the envelope "knowing that everything has a breaking point".
Joe |
On the non-supercharged outboards, how are they getting more power out of them? Are these newer 4-strokes just that conservatively tuned from the factory?
|
Also, on the newer Merc V8's, how much can the rev limiter be raised without sacrificing reliability?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.