Notices
General Boating Discussion

Single or Twins?????

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-02-2003 | 10:36 PM
  #31  
MAKDADDY
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Originally posted by MissAmy
I want something that I can feel comfortable driving, parking, and maneuvering.

I am intimidated by twins and told Lutz that maybe we should consider a single engine for this reason.

So be honest.....how tough is it gonna be for me to learn to drive?
Miss Amy

Michelle (My Wife) has been docking and loading twin screws for 10 years , She does just fine.
In fact some say she does better then me.

I am sure she would love to talk to you.
let us know
Greg
 
Reply
Old 11-05-2007 | 04:56 PM
  #32  
kubcat's Avatar
Platinum Member
15 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 228
Likes: 4
From: Sydney Australia
Default

Originally Posted by GO4BROKE
Thats good advice from Thunderdan. The only motor that ever had trouble on my boat is the one with the powersteering pump, thats the starboard motor. So my next boat will have 2 port motors 'cause they don't break!!
Of course, for safety's sake, you should get triples, just to have an extra motor to limp home with. I almost have the wife convinced of that theory....
This is amazing. I have had 3 boats with twins and all my problems have been with the port motors. I thought it was a Southern hemisphere thing....
kubcat is offline  
Reply
Old 11-06-2007 | 06:54 PM
  #33  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 48
From: Newbury Park, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Von Bongo
Small blocks use less fuel, weigh less and would gove you a little more room in the bildge.
I've looked at fuel consumption data, and I have not seen any appreciable reduction in fuel consumption with small blocks vs. big blocks at the same speed. I think the reason for this is most of the fuel is going toward drag, rather than engine friction and pumping losses. At higher speeds, the small blocks could be worse than big blocks, because the engine fuel enrichment will kick in with the smaller engines at lower speeds. Small blocks are also only about 150 pounds lighter than a big block, so the 300 pound reduction with twin small blocks is not much for a typical 28 ft boat that weighs 6000-7000 pounds with twins. A typical twin engine boat in the 28 to 30 foot range will get 2 mpg or less. A single engine boat in that range will get mid to high 2 mpg.

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-06-2007 | 08:44 PM
  #34  
Playn's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 1
From: BRENTWOOD, TN
Default

Damn, heres a thread from the way back machine!
Playn is offline  
Reply
Old 11-06-2007 | 10:29 PM
  #35  
GLH's Avatar
GLH
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,270
Likes: 21
From: Burlington, VT
Default

Triples..... If you can find them.....
Attached Thumbnails Single or Twins?????-dahm_triplets_22.jpg  

Last edited by GLH; 11-07-2007 at 02:17 PM.
GLH is offline  
Reply
Old 11-06-2007 | 10:48 PM
  #36  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,241
Likes: 2,490
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Holy old threads, Batman!!!!!!!!!!!
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2007 | 11:27 AM
  #37  
DonziChick's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Originally Posted by MissAmy
Thanks Dan,

It's those little "tricks" that I need to know to help me pick it up. I never drove the cruiser because I was way too intimidated by the size, the engines, etc, and never even attempted to learn.

But I am bound and determined to learn to drive our next one. If not just from a safety issue. I don't want Lutz to be the only one to know how to drive it.

Okay now...anybody else have any more advice for a female newbie?

Thanks again.
don't go faster than you want to hit the dock


Seriously - I learned to drive twins on my dad's Carver. Just take your time and experiment in an open marina with no one around to watch you - the same way you'd learn to drive a single. It isn't any harder, it's just different. Depending on the boat, it can be much easier.
DonziChick is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2007 | 11:29 AM
  #38  
DonziChick's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

I didn't even notice!

Oops!
DonziChick is offline  
Reply
Old 11-07-2007 | 09:50 PM
  #39  
Audiofn's Avatar
Charter Member #232
20 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 18,417
Likes: 6
From: Carlisle, MA USA
Default

They got a Formula 311 and they loved it. They did however sell it as they are doing a lot more water skiing these days/
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Audiofn is offline  
Reply
Old 11-09-2007 | 09:36 AM
  #40  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
A interesting pair of twins!

Show me the Twins!

Our new LSM 550 motors were developed for just this reason, how to get twin motors in the back of a 28-36 foot average comfortable performance boat without loading the back end of the boat with 2200 pounds of motors alone.

The new LSM550 dynos at 550HP at 5800 rpms , 565 ft/lbs of torque all the way from 3700 rpm to 4700 rpm and it weighs just under 500lbs per motor. Not bad for a 7.3liter all aluminum freshwater cooled small block LS based engine!

You can see them @ www.raylarengine.com

Put two of these in a 28 - 36 foot twin hull and the 1200lbs you just dropped out of the back of the boat should make a big difference in performance and economy!

Just thought I would throw in a new twist to the twins versus single controversy!

Regards,

Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.