OT: Just received a new assessment...
#63
Originally posted by GLH
Boooo Hooooo Hooooo find another $ 25k camp with cheap ass taxes they're are plenty around, please...
You two guys are intelligent people you think you have an argument about unfair taxes because the place your parents bought 25 years ago for $10k is now worth $2 Mill. Come on guys cry me a freakn river... fess up to the value you will enjoy when you sell them or MOVE as Bob said you can't be serious!!!
Or whinne but share ALL the capital gains, Please!
That is funny!!!


Boooo Hooooo Hooooo find another $ 25k camp with cheap ass taxes they're are plenty around, please...
You two guys are intelligent people you think you have an argument about unfair taxes because the place your parents bought 25 years ago for $10k is now worth $2 Mill. Come on guys cry me a freakn river... fess up to the value you will enjoy when you sell them or MOVE as Bob said you can't be serious!!!
Or whinne but share ALL the capital gains, Please!
That is funny!!!



I'd rather see a 75% capital tax rate for those that sell their homes to offset the prop taxes for those that stay put.
Last edited by mr_velocity; 03-05-2004 at 10:21 AM.
#64
Originally posted by GLH
Before shaking the tree HB try watering it for a while.
Before shaking the tree HB try watering it for a while.
#65
I know Shane I was just making a point.
GL although I can apreciate your argument about the value going up more then the taxes, IE
Purchase Price of 300,000
Taxes of 10,000
10% increase in house = 30,000
You are ahead 20,000 right.....
Well lets use Mass numbers
Purchase price of my house 300,000
Taxes are 1900
10% increase (average over the last 10 years) 30,000
Tax increase is minimal
Gain is 27,000 - 28,00 a year
Now lets look at NY
100,000 for the house
Taxes are 10,000 or more
Increase of 10% is 10,000
Gain is ZERO
So it is a wash
Now what state would you rather live in? This is why industry is running from states like NY and CALI. The people that are setting up these taxes just do not understand. I would be very interested to know what the taxation was when the Boston Tea Party happened. I am willing to bet we are taxed more then they were back then. You have to admit it does suck that they are being taxed so heavily. There is no way in hell I would ever live in NY because of the taxes, and THIS COMING FROM A GUY THAT LIVES IN TAXACHUSETTS!!!
Jon
GL although I can apreciate your argument about the value going up more then the taxes, IE
Purchase Price of 300,000
Taxes of 10,000
10% increase in house = 30,000
You are ahead 20,000 right.....
Well lets use Mass numbers
Purchase price of my house 300,000
Taxes are 1900
10% increase (average over the last 10 years) 30,000
Tax increase is minimal
Gain is 27,000 - 28,00 a year
Now lets look at NY
100,000 for the house
Taxes are 10,000 or more
Increase of 10% is 10,000
Gain is ZERO
So it is a wash
Now what state would you rather live in? This is why industry is running from states like NY and CALI. The people that are setting up these taxes just do not understand. I would be very interested to know what the taxation was when the Boston Tea Party happened. I am willing to bet we are taxed more then they were back then. You have to admit it does suck that they are being taxed so heavily. There is no way in hell I would ever live in NY because of the taxes, and THIS COMING FROM A GUY THAT LIVES IN TAXACHUSETTS!!!
Jon
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Put your best foot forward!
#66
Originally posted by Audiofn
There is no way in hell I would ever live in NY because of the taxes, and THIS COMING FROM A GUY THAT LIVES IN TAXACHUSETTS!!!
Jon
There is no way in hell I would ever live in NY because of the taxes, and THIS COMING FROM A GUY THAT LIVES IN TAXACHUSETTS!!!
Jon
#67
Mr Velocity. My mother wanted to GIVE me my grandfathers house in Franklin Lakes. It is in a way high end area and on a lake. I said NO THANKS because of all that BS.
Jon
Jon
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Put your best foot forward!
#68
Originally posted by Shane
Unfortunately, some viewed it as whining and commented accordingly.
Unfortunately, some viewed it as whining and commented accordingly.
I will also admit the I have never looked at a piece of property as Mr.Velocity designates as "my home" assesing a value other then strickly monetary to it, that is a product of the education I have been subject too up to now. I have no knowledge how to evaluate feelings in property worth and have found it to be more of an inderance than anything. Thank god cities have not found a way to tax that also!
Both Shane and Mr. V have values at stake here that I cannot relate too and it was my mistake to comment on this. I wish them good luck in thir quest for equity.
#69
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,548
Likes: 1
From: Niskayuna, NY
Thank you GLH. Your last thoughts are much appreciated and shed light on where you are coming from. In my eyes there is investment real estate and HOME. The LG house is HOME. There is virtually no amount of money that I will take to sell that house. It is worth far more than any amount of money someone would be willing to pay. Again, thank you.
#70
Originally posted by Shane
Thank you GLH. Your last thoughts are much appreciated and shed light on where you are coming from. In my eyes there is investment real estate and HOME. The LG house is HOME. There is virtually no amount of money that I will take to sell that house. It is worth far more than any amount of money someone would be willing to pay. Again, thank you.
Thank you GLH. Your last thoughts are much appreciated and shed light on where you are coming from. In my eyes there is investment real estate and HOME. The LG house is HOME. There is virtually no amount of money that I will take to sell that house. It is worth far more than any amount of money someone would be willing to pay. Again, thank you.


