Removal of 496HO restriction plates
#91
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
Thank You. No, we had GM use special rework to a special GM racing block so we could configure it as what we now call a GEN 7 symetrical aluminum head engine foundation. We are very proud of this motor and its mild manners, affordable pricing and phenominal braod torque based power. This new engine will also usher in something new to the industry. A motor that is delivered to the owner with its own ECM programming software so an interested owner or builder can take his laptop and fine tune his motor on the "fly" if he so chooses.
#93
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
Chris:
Patientence my man! We are doing the flow testing now and what I can tell you at this point is that there are four seperate exhaust passages in the stock Merc (Gil) 496 manifold. All three are substaintilally different in the size of the openings under the riser. One will flow 240 cfm, one 202 cfm, one 180cfm and another 205 cfm. This in-balance coupled with low flow on three of the four ports hurts horsepower and is definitly improveable. We have done some minor porting on these in the past and seen 5-10HP gains on our 525Hp motors on the dyno. We are now carefully studying and reworking all four ports to flow about 250 cfm and in the next week or so we should get back on the dyno with a pair and really document the gains. Once we have done this and confirmed there is some realistic power improvement here for the dollar spent, then we will release the real gain numbers and the cost for the exchange manifolds. I suspect its going to be in the $400-$500 per pair exchange range, but thats a guesstimate and only if its worthwhile. Nothing before its time! Stay tuned I'll keep you guys posted.
Ray @ Raylar
Patientence my man! We are doing the flow testing now and what I can tell you at this point is that there are four seperate exhaust passages in the stock Merc (Gil) 496 manifold. All three are substaintilally different in the size of the openings under the riser. One will flow 240 cfm, one 202 cfm, one 180cfm and another 205 cfm. This in-balance coupled with low flow on three of the four ports hurts horsepower and is definitly improveable. We have done some minor porting on these in the past and seen 5-10HP gains on our 525Hp motors on the dyno. We are now carefully studying and reworking all four ports to flow about 250 cfm and in the next week or so we should get back on the dyno with a pair and really document the gains. Once we have done this and confirmed there is some realistic power improvement here for the dollar spent, then we will release the real gain numbers and the cost for the exchange manifolds. I suspect its going to be in the $400-$500 per pair exchange range, but thats a guesstimate and only if its worthwhile. Nothing before its time! Stay tuned I'll keep you guys posted.
Ray @ Raylar
#97
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
No, not the older Gil HP manifolds. they are a different design than the new Merc 496 manifolds and do not have the same port restrictions. The Merc 496 manifolds were designed and built by Gil for Merc.
Ray @ Raylar
Ray @ Raylar


