CMI 496 headers
#21
Re: CMI 496 headers
Run a search and you'll find results from end users.......
......have been running them for several weeks with what I would consider fairly good results. I am running a Velocity 290, with a Bravo 1 labbed 28. Started at @ 4900 RPM, 72-73 on spedo. I am now at @5150, 76-77 on spedo, but running out of prop at times. Tried a Bravo 1 labbed 30, but it was a bit too much prop. Ran close to 4900 RPM, but speed was not there. That prop is being worked on now to hopefully allow me to run at 5050, and perhaps gain another MPH or so. Velocity hulls react very well to minimal power, so other hulls may not see the same results. If I maintain a consistent 4, I will be satisfied. I always run above half full on fuel, so that is not an issue.
.....Results are in on the 496 CMIs, 482hp with no other mods. Sounds good. See latest Powerboat Mag
......have been running them for several weeks with what I would consider fairly good results. I am running a Velocity 290, with a Bravo 1 labbed 28. Started at @ 4900 RPM, 72-73 on spedo. I am now at @5150, 76-77 on spedo, but running out of prop at times. Tried a Bravo 1 labbed 30, but it was a bit too much prop. Ran close to 4900 RPM, but speed was not there. That prop is being worked on now to hopefully allow me to run at 5050, and perhaps gain another MPH or so. Velocity hulls react very well to minimal power, so other hulls may not see the same results. If I maintain a consistent 4, I will be satisfied. I always run above half full on fuel, so that is not an issue.
.....Results are in on the 496 CMIs, 482hp with no other mods. Sounds good. See latest Powerboat Mag
Last edited by TRICK; 10-12-2006 at 01:55 PM.
#23
Registered
Re: CMI 496 headers
Originally Posted by TRICK
Run a search and you'll find results from end users.......
[COLOR=Red Velocity hulls react very well to minimal power, so other hulls may not see the same results. If I maintain a consistent 4, I will be satisfied. I always run above half full on fuel, so that is not an issue.[/COLOR]
.....Results are in on the 496 CMIs, 482hp with no other mods. Sounds good. See latest Powerboat Mag
[COLOR=Red Velocity hulls react very well to minimal power, so other hulls may not see the same results. If I maintain a consistent 4, I will be satisfied. I always run above half full on fuel, so that is not an issue.[/COLOR]
.....Results are in on the 496 CMIs, 482hp with no other mods. Sounds good. See latest Powerboat Mag
The part about Velocity's bottom responding very well to power(among the best) is certianly true. Owned 2.
like I said earlier, single engine fast bottoms/lighter boats seem to be the ones getting the gains for the $$.
So you guys have it made at 1K per MPH.
Point me in the direction of documented results on 9-10 thousand pound twin boats.
57 HP? That's a new high quote.
Again Dyno...CMI buy a big ad in PB this month?
Just kidding!
#24
Registered
Re: CMI 496 headers
I'm not busting vendor's balls...
CMI's for pricing is more to the point, price 'em like (and make them in satin) satin elbow tops and they'll sell like hotcakes.
no one's guinnepigging them on heavy twins.
Give me a couple pair. After 200+ hours on my 353 I know where my boat stands in terms of performance. I'll report accurately and scientifically.
CMI's for pricing is more to the point, price 'em like (and make them in satin) satin elbow tops and they'll sell like hotcakes.
no one's guinnepigging them on heavy twins.
Give me a couple pair. After 200+ hours on my 353 I know where my boat stands in terms of performance. I'll report accurately and scientifically.
#25
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: CMI 496 headers
Originally Posted by Chris288
I believe Raylar was in the process of developing an exchange program for your stock manifolds for his ported ones...
#26
Re: CMI 496 headers
Originally Posted by ECeptor
Then I'd just need another winter project to keep me busy! The power gain isn't the point...it's the time in my shop that really makes it a worth while endevor. Far cheaper than visiting a shrink!
#27
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK, Grand, Beaver, LOTO
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: CMI 496 headers
so conservatively call it 80-100 horse for twins- that's got to be good for something- compared to the more intrusive options of the Raylar kit (worthy) and the Whipple SC (also worthy) at a higher expense.
I'd like to see some documented twin results too- but the first ones I see may be my own. something is coming- just not sure how soon (Antbody want to buy a nice Pantera- CMI's included )
I'd like to see some documented twin results too- but the first ones I see may be my own. something is coming- just not sure how soon (Antbody want to buy a nice Pantera- CMI's included )
#28
Registered
Re: CMI 496 headers
8 grand will buy one helluva lot of anodized bezel and powder coated bling... easily making my boat 3 MPH faster at the dock.
right back at 'ya.
(just having fun now...)
right back at 'ya.
(just having fun now...)
#29
Re: CMI 496 headers
I can provide a few names and phone numbers to customers who would be willing to share the results of twin installations.
If you're seriously considering an upgrade of exhaust, give me a call and I'll send you in the right direction for real world numbers from the users mouths. .
If you're seriously considering an upgrade of exhaust, give me a call and I'll send you in the right direction for real world numbers from the users mouths. .
#30
Registered
Re: CMI 496 headers
Originally Posted by Pantera28-650HP
Good luck with whatever you do. As long were having fun doing what we enjoy right?!