Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
CMI 496 headers >

CMI 496 headers

Notices

CMI 496 headers

Old 10-12-2006 | 12:46 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

Originally Posted by Rippem
right-on...try 7-8K for 3-4 in a twin app. 2K+ per MPH is at the top of the $ food chain as far as I'm concerned.
I agree. So, do you or anyone on here know of and are willing to share how to port the stock 496 headers for more flow? I have plenty of time this winter to do a ton of hand work...
ECeptor is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 12:49 PM
  #22  
Chris288's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

Originally Posted by ECeptor
I agree. So, do you or anyone on here know of and are willing to share how to port the stock 496 headers for more flow? I have plenty of time this winter to do a ton of hand work...
I believe Raylar was in the process of developing an exchange program for your stock manifolds for his ported ones...
Chris288 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 01:28 PM
  #23  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 42
From: 1000 Islands
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

not worth much tho...10-15 hp?
Rippem is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 01:49 PM
  #24  
Too Old's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,713
Likes: 1
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

Run a search and you'll find results from end users.......

......have been running them for several weeks with what I would consider fairly good results. I am running a Velocity 290, with a Bravo 1 labbed 28. Started at @ 4900 RPM, 72-73 on spedo. I am now at @5150, 76-77 on spedo, but running out of prop at times. Tried a Bravo 1 labbed 30, but it was a bit too much prop. Ran close to 4900 RPM, but speed was not there. That prop is being worked on now to hopefully allow me to run at 5050, and perhaps gain another MPH or so. Velocity hulls react very well to minimal power, so other hulls may not see the same results. If I maintain a consistent 4, I will be satisfied. I always run above half full on fuel, so that is not an issue.

.....Results are in on the 496 CMIs, 482hp with no other mods. Sounds good. See latest Powerboat Mag

Last edited by TRICK; 10-12-2006 at 01:55 PM.
Too Old is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 01:54 PM
  #25  
Chris288's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

well if we all went by speedo #'s I wouldnt need these headers...
Chris288 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 02:12 PM
  #26  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 42
From: 1000 Islands
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

Originally Posted by TRICK
Run a search and you'll find results from end users.......

[COLOR=Red Velocity hulls react very well to minimal power, so other hulls may not see the same results. If I maintain a consistent 4, I will be satisfied. I always run above half full on fuel, so that is not an issue.[/COLOR]

.....Results are in on the 496 CMIs, 482hp with no other mods. Sounds good. See latest Powerboat Mag

The part about Velocity's bottom responding very well to power(among the best) is certianly true. Owned 2.

like I said earlier, single engine fast bottoms/lighter boats seem to be the ones getting the gains for the $$.

So you guys have it made at 1K per MPH.

Point me in the direction of documented results on 9-10 thousand pound twin boats.



57 HP? That's a new high quote.

Again Dyno...CMI buy a big ad in PB this month?

Just kidding!
Rippem is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 02:21 PM
  #27  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 42
From: 1000 Islands
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

I'm not busting vendor's balls...

CMI's for pricing is more to the point, price 'em like (and make them in satin) satin elbow tops and they'll sell like hotcakes.

no one's guinnepigging them on heavy twins.

Give me a couple pair. After 200+ hours on my 353 I know where my boat stands in terms of performance. I'll report accurately and scientifically.
Rippem is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 02:31 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 476
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

Originally Posted by Chris288
I believe Raylar was in the process of developing an exchange program for your stock manifolds for his ported ones...
Then I'd just need another winter project to keep me busy! The power gain isn't the point...it's the time in my shop that really makes it a worth while endevor. Far cheaper than visiting a shrink!
ECeptor is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 02:39 PM
  #29  
Chris288's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

Originally Posted by ECeptor
Then I'd just need another winter project to keep me busy! The power gain isn't the point...it's the time in my shop that really makes it a worth while endevor. Far cheaper than visiting a shrink!
Somebody has the specs. on the DIY manifold porting, ask 26Sonic from the board, I think he knows who has the blue-print..
Chris288 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-12-2006 | 03:11 PM
  #30  
Elite Marine's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,658
Likes: 1
From: IL
Default Re: CMI 496 headers

Guys, let's be realistic. They are worth some performance gains. Maybe not as much as billet throttles, colored bezels, mirrored hatches or any of the thousands of other parts we spend a ton of $$ on and install on our boats for that little something extra.

CMI makes a great performing and looking product that may not be for everyone or everyone's budget. Do they enhance the performance of the engine? Yes. Is going to get you into the record books with stock power? Probably not. Do they perform and look cool - YES!!
Elite Marine is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.