Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Opinions on Headers >

Opinions on Headers

Notices

Opinions on Headers

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-18-2008 | 08:36 PM
  #11  
Rebel_Heart's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,173
Likes: 0
From: LOTO
Default

Running CMI e-tops on 540s. Looks as though I made a good choice.
Rebel_Heart is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2008 | 12:00 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
Wink

CMI Big Tube E-tops should be the best for a 900HP 540 blower motor. Strong, reasonably priced and real pretty in polished! Just my two cents.

Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2008 | 07:07 AM
  #13  
bob
Charter Member #40
25 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 104
From: Cape Coral, FL
Default

From what I have seen, in salt applications with 900+ hp big tube set ups, you get to 225+ hours with either Stellings or CMI you can get ready to start chasing cracks at the collector and flanges. Once they start developing, they just keep on coming. I haven't heard of any official studies done nor do I expect a mfg to divulge their warranty or product health numbers.
bob is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2008 | 10:50 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 1
From: Chesapeake Bay
Default

From what I have seen CMI makes two types of Headers , The ones that Leak and the ones that are going to leak . Just my $0.02.
formula 382 sr-1 is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2008 | 04:04 PM
  #15  
scarabman's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,038
Likes: 227
From: TR, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by Elite Marine
Mercury headers are thinner and of a different alloy than the CMI headers. You guys really need to keep your facts straight.

I dont know of anyone that has had a failure of CMI headers, not the Mercury product!!!

If you pick up a set of 500 EFi headers vs an Elbow Top, you'd see what the difference is.

They are the best flowing exhaust on the market - period!!

Thats why Mercury buys them, except they make them out of a less quality alloy than the SS CMI does. And they are thinner!!
Youre logic is a little circular, dont you think?

Last edited by scarabman; 10-19-2008 at 05:05 PM.
scarabman is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2008 | 06:58 PM
  #16  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
Default

Besides the $$$ what are the major performance differences with the Big E-tops versus the Big Tubes? Also at what HP is it necessary to go with the stepped E-tops?
stormbauer is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2008 | 07:17 PM
  #17  
jimdarr40
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Have had imco powerflows,Eickert manifolds, cmi e tops, cmi big tubes, other than the prices, have'nt noticed any difference in performance, with them, I've had from 725hp to 1150hp, save your money.
 
Reply
Old 10-19-2008 | 08:49 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
Wink

I have not heard of a lot of CMI E-tops cracking and leaking, I cannot say that about regular or big tube CMI sweepers. Most blower motors will make better power with the big tube E-tops than with any sort of long tube header. I understand that the Stainless Marine High Torque III header/manifolds also work very well on blower motors.
Just my two cents.

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Reply
Old 10-19-2008 | 08:56 PM
  #19  
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Here is some CMI comparisons done at Keith Eicherts. All done on a NA 500 CI
Big E-tops - 765 HP
Sport Tubes (1 7/8" ID) - 785 HP
Big Tubes (2 1/4" ID) 800 HP
BenPerfected is offline  
Reply
Old 10-20-2008 | 11:09 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
Wink Blower motors generally need different headers

I believe this post was started with the motor being a 540" blown motor. Header results for blower motors will be totaly different than those for a N/A motor. Just thought I would clarify so those not in the know would not get further confused.

Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.