Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
604 CI Build sheet >

604 CI Build sheet

Notices

604 CI Build sheet

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-26-2011 | 01:55 PM
  #21  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Default

Who is Bob? Do you have a number?



Originally Posted by RunninHotRacing163.1
Ken give Bob a call i think you'll like what ya hear, no need for a SOLID and the Xtra work that goes along with it ..He just dynoed a 1430 Hp motor with a Hydraulic .good luck
ken sampson is offline  
Reply
Old 01-26-2011 | 02:12 PM
  #22  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 3
From: Frankfort,ill
Default

Originally Posted by Coolerman
Hey RunninHot, what intercoolers are you using? Who's making the manifold? Sounds like a cool build (both you and Ken).
We are not using an under the blower cooler.

The water/alky will still be there.

We are buying an off the shelf cooler to put after the turbos.

We are making the manifold inhouse .

Last edited by RunninHotRacing163.1; 01-26-2011 at 02:16 PM. Reason: spelling
RunninHotRacing163.1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-26-2011 | 02:13 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 3
From: Frankfort,ill
Default

Originally Posted by ken sampson
Who is Bob? Do you have a number?
Rob Madera 585-654-8583
RunninHotRacing163.1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-27-2011 | 06:24 AM
  #24  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks. I just wanted to be sure I am ordering the correct cam. My engine builder came up with the below spec. This seems a little small to me.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
SCAN0762_000.pdf (15.4 KB, 245 views)
ken sampson is offline  
Reply
Old 01-27-2011 | 07:41 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 3
From: Frankfort,ill
Default

Originally Posted by ken sampson
Thanks. I just wanted to be sure I am ordering the correct cam. My engine builder came up with the below spec. This seems a little small to me.
Did you talk to Rob yest , sharp as a Tack
RunninHotRacing163.1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-27-2011 | 08:27 AM
  #26  
GPM
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,696
Likes: 93
From: Pa
Default

Originally Posted by ken sampson
Thanks. I just wanted to be sure I am ordering the correct cam. My engine builder came up with the below spec. This seems a little small to me.
That would work nice in a 454
GPM is offline  
Reply
Old 01-27-2011 | 11:02 AM
  #27  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Default

I did get to talk with Bob. However he was running out the door to catch a plane. I have decided to call Crane cam and based on my build this is what they came up with.
690 Lift 262/274 @ 50 LS 114 with 1.8 rockers.
I wish I knew enough to say go ahead. Bob will be back in town early next week so I guess I should wait.
Thanks
ken sampson is offline  
Reply
Old 01-27-2011 | 11:34 AM
  #28  
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Default

My recommendation was on the conservative side based on your rpm limitations. I use that combo as the maximum size hydraulic roller in a 572 application and have alot of good experience with it. The cam your builder proposed is very small in my opinion, it will make a ton of torque but I don't think it will carry up the rpm range. I consider 248/252 @ .050 the smallest duration I would use for your application. The 1.8 rockers are a great recommendation. They will put extra lift on the valve and allow a less aggressive camshaft ramp profile, keep in mind they have a net effect of slightly adding duration to the camshaft. Good Luck.
Boat1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-27-2011 | 11:44 AM
  #29  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 3
From: Frankfort,ill
Default

Originally Posted by ken sampson
I did get to talk with Bob. However he was running out the door to catch a plane. I have decided to call Crane cam and based on my build this is what they came up with.
690 Lift 262/274 @ 50 LS 114 with 1.8 rockers.
I wish I knew enough to say go ahead. Bob will be back in town early next week so I guess I should wait.
Thanks
Ken wait it out a few days till Rob gets back ,and he's also a dealer for 30 parts companys so can he can save you some coin $$$$ i know your Antsy but whats a couple dayz ??
RunninHotRacing163.1 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-27-2011 | 11:48 AM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 12,849
Likes: 3
From: Frankfort,ill
Default

Originally Posted by Boat1
My recommendation was on the conservative side based on your rpm limitations. I use that combo as the maximum size hydraulic roller in a 572 application and have alot of good experience with it. The cam your builder proposed is very small in my opinion, it will make a ton of torque but I don't think it will carry up the rpm range. I consider 248/252 @ .050 the smallest duration I would use for your application. The 1.8 rockers are a great recommendation. They will put extra lift on the valve and allow a less aggressive camshaft ramp profile, keep in mind they have a net effect of slightly adding duration to the camshaft. Good Luck.
What he said

for some reason i just like Radical/agressive cams and adjusting Valve lash all the time .
RunninHotRacing163.1 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.