![]() |
Originally Posted by HaxbySpeed
(Post 3633583)
Sorry, guess it wasn't clear. For twins TBI = $5000
For twins with an MPI style set up = $7000. I'm at 580 cu in, blown with twin carbs. Will that raise/lower the pricing? |
Originally Posted by HaxbySpeed
(Post 3632639)
In the interest of full disclosure.. When I started this thread I was just a consumer that was very happy with a new product. Since then I have become a Holley EFI dealer and authorized tuning center. So if it seems like I'm biased.. I probably am :lolhit:
But it's still the most kick azz system out there right now, and the only one that's USCG certified. |
Originally Posted by GPM
(Post 3637504)
Just curious if you tried one of these and what you thought, http://www.ebay.com/itm/FAST-XFI-2-0...93899191398674
|
Originally Posted by HaxbySpeed
(Post 3637568)
No, I heard they were working on it but I didn't know they had them in production yet. I'm sure it will be excellent like their automotive stuff. I think it's great that these companies are working hard to provide a marine specific product, and a little competition can only benefit the consumers. I'll definitely check it out.
|
Great thread.
Being a MoTeC dealer and using it on our race cars, I can't wait to get rid of the carbs on my BBC's. No offense to anyone, but it feels like carbs on a performance engine are akin to solid rubber tires on a daily driver :) I have to say though, for all my boat is (isn't) this Holley set-up looks like the way to go. Even an M84 at dealer cost can't touch the price difference with the Holley system. Not that I expected it to :) Being a data nut its knowing what's going on, with the driveability of EFI being a plus that I like. Turn the key with a perfect idle when engines are cold and drop the drives into gear leaving a busy ramp, all that. I think I'm sold on this Holley system. How much memory and how many channels for data logging in the Holley ECU Haxby? Enough memory for a decent amount of data logging time? When bad things happen its always nice to look back... and even when nothing is going wrong its nice to have a look through when back home and know everything is good to go again next time out. Peace of mind. I don't think I'll be showing the MoTeC people under the hatch. Lol... |
Originally Posted by Rookie17
(Post 3639710)
Great thread.
Being a MoTeC dealer and using it on our race cars, I can't wait to get rid of the carbs on my BBC's. No offense to anyone, but it feels like carbs on a performance engine are akin to solid rubber tires on a daily driver :) I have to say though, for all my boat is (isn't) this Holley set-up looks like the way to go. Even an M84 at dealer cost can't touch the price difference with the Holley system. Not that I expected it to :) Being a data nut its knowing what's going on, with the driveability of EFI being a plus that I like. Turn the key with a perfect idle when engines are cold and drop the drives into gear leaving a busy ramp, all that. I think I'm sold on this Holley system. How much memory and how many channels for data logging in the Holley ECU Haxby? All ecm readable functions are available and you can select which ones you want to record Enough memory for a decent amount of data logging time? 2.0GB! Depending on how many FPS you choose and how many channels, that's a ton of information. You can choose to have recording triggered from almost anything like above a set rpm, boost, temp, below a certain oil psi, you can trigger it from a switch or just have it record full time. When bad things happen its always nice to look back... and even when nothing is going wrong its nice to have a look through when back home and know everything is good to go again next time out. Peace of mind. I don't think I'll be showing the MoTeC people under the hatch. Lol... |
I don't think the Holley system support a MAF sensor does it?
Michael |
fixx
Originally Posted by Michael1
(Post 3639967)
I don't think the Holley system support a MAF sensor does it?
Michael |
Yup, 2 Gig of data is more than plenty. With a sensible FPS and basic channels that could be a whole day of data on the water for me.
Not sure on your comment about any 12 year old could do it though. Knowing and understanding software is one thing, knowing and understanding what an engine needs to perform and stay healthy is something else. Even with a self learn feature, you still need an understanding of what is safe for your particular engine(s) with many of the parameters. As good as the self learn feature may be, there is no way I would trust my engines 100% to some software developer hoping that he got his one's and zero's correct. Self learn is no doubt a great tool, and could speed up the process. Personally for me, there is too much money in the engine compartment to trust it blindly. No matter how many times it worked well. Hence my questions about memory size and data collection capability. |
Originally Posted by Rookie17
(Post 3640139)
Yup, 2 Gig of data is more than plenty. With a sensible FPS and basic channels that could be a whole day of data on the water for me.
Not sure on your comment about any 12 year old could do it though. Knowing and understanding software is one thing, knowing and understanding what an engine needs to perform and stay healthy is something else. Even with a self learn feature, you still need an understanding of what is safe for your particular engine(s) with many of the parameters. As good as the self learn feature may be, there is no way I would trust my engines 100% to some software developer hoping that he got his one's and zero's correct. Self learn is no doubt a great tool, and could speed up the process. Personally for me, there is too much money in the engine compartment to trust it blindly. No matter how many times it worked well. Hence my questions about memory size and data collection capability. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.