![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
No need to re-rig to a lesser drive, Konrad's 540PRS is a direct bolt-on unit designed to replace the TRS. It's 1.7" shorter from input shaft to prop shaft. This increase in propshaft height typically results in gains of 3-5 mph when compared to the TRS. 7 qts gear lube capacity, rated to handle up to 800hp.
|
Bravo drives belong on a house boat... Listen to Biggus you can't go wrong
|
Originally Posted by lucky strike
(Post 3605363)
Bravo drives belong on a house boat... Listen to Biggus you can't go wrong
|
With your motors sitting 2 foot forward, 3 inches higher, 200 more weight, more hydrodynamic drag, and needing an extra 100 ponies. Yea I would say even if a TRS could somehow hold 150 more hp than a bravo it would need more than that to equal to performance.
|
Originally Posted by charliem
(Post 3605396)
With your motors sitting 2 foot forward, 3 inches higher, 200 more weight, more hydrodynamic drag, and needing an extra 100 ponies. Yea I would say even if a TRS could somehow hold 150 more hp than a bravo it would need more than that to equal to performance.
Yes, there's speed to be gained, Bravo to TRS but most gain is from the ingrease in propshaft height with the Bravo being about 2.5" shorter than a TRS. Swapping from TRS to Bravo is a huge undertaking with the end result, a weaker drive. |
Trs, transmission, whatever parts are way more than 120 lb heavier. TRS is 3 inches longer. Hydrodynamics have to be worth a bunch.
|
Originally Posted by Biggus
(Post 3605312)
No need to re-rig to a lesser drive, Konrad's 540PRS is a direct bolt-on unit designed to replace the TRS. It's 1.7" shorter from input shaft to prop shaft. This increase in propshaft height typically results in gains of 3-5 mph when compared to the TRS. 7 qts gear lube capacity, rated to handle up to 800hp.
http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/e...magejpeg_3.jpg |
Originally Posted by BDiggity
(Post 3605424)
i liked your 540's so much i had my TRS's painted to match. Hopefully one of these years i can have the real deal
http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/e...magejpeg_3.jpg |
Originally Posted by BDiggity
(Post 3605424)
i liked your 540's so much i had my TRS's painted to match. Hopefully one of these years i can have the real deal
http://i534.photobucket.com/albums/e...magejpeg_3.jpg X2 :) http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i4...b/80f28b91.jpg |
The trs is 2.5 iches longer like biggus said..But you do shed alot of weight I would say about 275/300 per side. The trans alone is about 125/150. I have done the conversion a bunch of times and every time a big difference in performance..two of them were mine. One was a 27 excalibur with the same motor and the x was 19.5 with the trs when i converted it to bravo I set it at 19 and i gained a best of 7 MPH. Boat ran a best of 80 with the trs and that was only once, then when a did a bravo 87 MPH and that was a bunch of times... My 10 meter I gained 6 mph and the boat handles way better. If you can do it yourself I would do it. A bravo boat will sell alot easier than a trs.. Just my 2 cents
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.