Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Header Choices >

Header Choices

Notices

Header Choices

Old 04-14-2012 | 04:30 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,277
Likes: 5
From: Stockholm, Svea Rike
Default

Like Ray and Mild Thunders says. Stainless Marine Gen III This is my first pair of SM. But done CMI Sport Tubes, CMI Big Tubes and Stellings Big Tubes before. With mixxed experience....

Jerry and Letty at Stainless Marine are great people with lots of knowledge and good service

Just in the rigging process so don't mind the mess.


Mange
Attached Thumbnails Header Choices-ac142.jpg   Header Choices-ac168.jpg   Header Choices-ac170.jpg  

Mange is offline  
Reply
Old 04-14-2012 | 06:31 PM
  #12  
blue thunder's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 6
From: IBX
Default

Originally Posted by Raylar
I realize many cast manifolds and manifold headers will usually have a problem with clearance height on lower head row of ARP type studs as studs on this row are taller than head bolts and require more clearance that most all brands of cast manifolds do not have versus flange style tubular headers whcih generally do not have a head stud clearance problem at the same point.

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar
I also had to grind down the arp head bolts to clear, not just the studs. I never tried it but have heard tale of the SM exhaust actually working better than a header on a blower engine. No facts on that just heresay.
blue thunder is offline  
Reply
Old 04-15-2012 | 10:30 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 12
From: San Diego, California
Wink

On a big horsepower normally aspirated engine generally the KE's and tubular long tube headers will make more torque and power than the manifold(Stainless, etc. ) and E-top types. Normally aspirated engines perform better with longer individual tubes to scavenge the exhaust out better.
On a blower engine with higher boost levels (7-25psi)setup the stainless Marine Hi-Torque III and big tube E-tops and big tube (2-1/4" -2-1/2" ID) tubular will work best as your are trying harder on these engines to get the increased volume of exhaust gas out quickly. You still must be careful though to keep your torque and power up and consider how much of the time you are in boost and at what boost levels, as the rest of the time you are still operating as a normally aspirated engine not in boost or at very low boost levels (1-3psi). At these non-boost or very low boost areas, big tube headers or some larger passage manifolds can actually kill some of the lower rpm torque and power developed with scavenging and will negatively affect acceleration and mid-rpm performance. The KE's cast sweepers are pretty big passage units and probably work just as well , just have never had an opportunity to test or run a blower engine with them.

Nice set-up Mange, beautifully built & rigged and looks like that is gonna be one fast cat!

Best Regards,
Ray @ Raylar

Last edited by Raylar; 04-15-2012 at 10:37 AM.
Raylar is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.