Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Motor out of tune after hard run... >

Motor out of tune after hard run...

Notices

Motor out of tune after hard run...

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-11-2002 | 04:18 PM
  #31  
TomZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Platinum Member
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 1,458
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Turbo,

I talked to the builder today and got the head flow numbers:

Lift Intake Exhaust

.100 63 60
.200 129 118
.300 184 149
.400 223 164
.500 235 171
.600 236 175

Jeff,

I'm probably over-estimating on fuel (I keep getting different numbers for the weight per gallon). So at 70 gallons with the weight being 7.0 pounds per gallon, that makes the weight with a full tank of gas 3905 (please tell me if I have the weight of gas wrong). Add me to the mix plus misc stuff and at best another 300 pounds. So about 4200 pounds. Not bad. So where is my speed?? There's got to be something else going on here.

On the cam front.... I ran some info through Wolverine's old CamSelect program. There was a utility in there that applied to boat engines called the Marine Engine 60 Percent Rule. In order to acheive maximum HP at 5800 RPM (which is where my max comes in according to the desktop dyno), I would need at least 388 foot pounds of torque at 3480 RPM. I'm guessing that the 3480 is the 60% throttle setting which would be cruise. Any thoughts on that?

I think I'm still going to run that other cam. I might just run it like it is though for the rest of the season, and work on some other things that'll help get the boat flying (some weight savings, less fuel, etc.). I think I need to work on some trimming as well. One thing I noticed with the 17P was that it would cavitate with aggressive trim angles (Mirage) while the older 21P Quicksilver would not (I don't even think that the trim was working right when I went out... another problem). So many variables here...

Later,
TomZ is offline  
Reply
Old 07-12-2002 | 06:23 AM
  #32  
jr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom, are those flow numbers before or after porting? I can put those numbers in to desktop dyno and get a more accurate number. I can probably get them Sunday sometime. I have to go out of town so I'm be away from my tube.

I always figured 8 lbs for fuel. I know that is too much but I rather over estimate than under. I agree at 4200 you should be faster.
 
Reply
Old 07-12-2002 | 07:22 AM
  #33  
TomZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Platinum Member
25 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 1,458
From: Virginia Beach
Default

Yeah, those are the numbers after porting.

I'm going to work on some things over the weekend and see what it nets me.

Thanks!
TomZ is offline  
Reply
Old 07-15-2002 | 08:37 PM
  #34  
jr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom I put in the flow numbers in for your heads and you get an increase of 9 HP to 393 and 8 LBS. to 409. The curve stayed the same but just moved up abit.

Hope this helps.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dodgelover
General Boating Discussion
61
12-19-2007 06:30 PM
Strip Poker 388
Drives and Lower Units
38
05-18-2007 08:04 AM
FlyFast
General Q & A
13
05-10-2004 11:39 PM
Danny Usnik
General Boating Discussion
16
06-30-2003 02:22 PM
hp500efi
General Q & A
7
10-22-2002 01:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.