Gear Ratio vs acceleration/speed
#12
Thread Starter
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Are you sure you have the right sheet? Mine shows HP climbing from 3000-5900. At 5900 and 6000 it stopped climbing but stayed the same number. No drop in HP on my sheet? Torque started falling off slightly after 5600
#13
Registered

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 143
What speed was he running in the previous tests?
In general it is more efficient to turn a big prop slower than a smaller pitch prop faster. Typically you switch from 1.5 to 1.36 gears when you run out of props (pitch maxed out).
At the speeds I'm guestimating he's running a 40 hp on the top end will be negligible simply due to drag rise. It may come down to more of a handling issue at those speeds and with that pitch.
I don't think it will be a monster. If he wants a monster accelerator keep 1.5 gears and throw on some 28" wheels.
In general it is more efficient to turn a big prop slower than a smaller pitch prop faster. Typically you switch from 1.5 to 1.36 gears when you run out of props (pitch maxed out).
At the speeds I'm guestimating he's running a 40 hp on the top end will be negligible simply due to drag rise. It may come down to more of a handling issue at those speeds and with that pitch.
I don't think it will be a monster. If he wants a monster accelerator keep 1.5 gears and throw on some 28" wheels.
#14
Registered

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Mokena,IL
What speed was he running in the previous tests?
In general it is more efficient to turn a big prop slower than a smaller pitch prop faster. Typically you switch from 1.5 to 1.36 gears when you run out of props (pitch maxed out).
At the speeds I'm guestimating he's running a 40 hp on the top end will be negligible simply due to drag rise. It may come down to more of a handling issue at those speeds and with that pitch.
I don't think it will be a monster. If he wants a monster accelerator keep 1.5 gears and throw on some 28" wheels.
In general it is more efficient to turn a big prop slower than a smaller pitch prop faster. Typically you switch from 1.5 to 1.36 gears when you run out of props (pitch maxed out).
At the speeds I'm guestimating he's running a 40 hp on the top end will be negligible simply due to drag rise. It may come down to more of a handling issue at those speeds and with that pitch.
I don't think it will be a monster. If he wants a monster accelerator keep 1.5 gears and throw on some 28" wheels.

#15
Registered

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Mokena,IL
I agree with you being easier on the drives (strain wise) but one of the biggest factors for killing drives is generating heat as well. Since the 1.36 is spinning faster than the 1.5, what about the extra heat thats being made? Wont that or will that contribute to premature bearing wear?
#20
Registered
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: QLD
I would have thought a 1.36 with lower pitch prop would accelerate marginally quicker than 1.5 with higher pitch. Due to the fact that the higher pitch prop is going to slip more and be less efficient until it reaches a certain speed. The lower pitch prop is more efficient at the lower speed (standing start and mid range). They may both even out at peak rpm as long as pitch selection is correct.
This is just my thoughts, I'm no prop guru.
This is just my thoughts, I'm no prop guru.





...