Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Gear Ratio vs acceleration/speed >

Gear Ratio vs acceleration/speed

Notices

Gear Ratio vs acceleration/speed

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:00 PM
  #11  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
Default

it started dropping about 5 hp per hundred rpm,only pulled it to 6100 because were going to prop it to max at 6000.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:09 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by mike tkach
it started dropping about 5 hp per hundred rpm,only pulled it to 6100 because were going to prop it to max at 6000.
Are you sure you have the right sheet? Mine shows HP climbing from 3000-5900. At 5900 and 6000 it stopped climbing but stayed the same number. No drop in HP on my sheet? Torque started falling off slightly after 5600
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:14 PM
  #13  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 143
Default

What speed was he running in the previous tests?

In general it is more efficient to turn a big prop slower than a smaller pitch prop faster. Typically you switch from 1.5 to 1.36 gears when you run out of props (pitch maxed out).

At the speeds I'm guestimating he's running a 40 hp on the top end will be negligible simply due to drag rise. It may come down to more of a handling issue at those speeds and with that pitch.

I don't think it will be a monster. If he wants a monster accelerator keep 1.5 gears and throw on some 28" wheels.
Trash is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:33 PM
  #14  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Mokena,IL
Default

Originally Posted by Trash
What speed was he running in the previous tests?

In general it is more efficient to turn a big prop slower than a smaller pitch prop faster. Typically you switch from 1.5 to 1.36 gears when you run out of props (pitch maxed out).

At the speeds I'm guestimating he's running a 40 hp on the top end will be negligible simply due to drag rise. It may come down to more of a handling issue at those speeds and with that pitch.

I don't think it will be a monster. If he wants a monster accelerator keep 1.5 gears and throw on some 28" wheels.
See from what everybody is telling me, they have gone from the 1.5 ratio to the 1.36 that they loose almost all acceleration and it takes forever to get to their top end. From what I have been learning and reading, as long as I dont go over a 36 pitch prop that the 1.5 ratio is more efficient, better accelleration and top end. Has anybody done this and proved this theory if so, please respond.
TunnelVision3100 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:38 PM
  #15  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Mokena,IL
Default

Originally Posted by abones
Sluggish to neck snapping I doubt it, I believe the 1:36 with the 32 prop would be easier on the drive, how long wll the drive last if he slams the sticks with either set up? I don't know just sayin.
I agree with you being easier on the drives (strain wise) but one of the biggest factors for killing drives is generating heat as well. Since the 1.36 is spinning faster than the 1.5, what about the extra heat thats being made? Wont that or will that contribute to premature bearing wear?
TunnelVision3100 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:52 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 1
From: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Default Fixx

Where is Riverrat when you need him,,i bet he has it all figured out


And so all the confusion begin's!!!
FIXX is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:57 PM
  #17  
the deep's Avatar
Fast Singles Club
Veteran: National Guard
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 490
From: Raystown Lake , Pa.
Wink

Originally Posted by mrfixxall
Where is Riverrat when you need him,,i bet he has it all figured out


And so all the confusion begin's!!!
This ......
the deep is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 10:57 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 1
From: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Default fixx

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Nope. He's keepin the -1 now lol
That should cost him 3-5 mph..is he running the captivation plate extensions?
FIXX is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 11:00 PM
  #19  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by mrfixxall
That should cost him 3-5 mph..is he running the captivation plate extensions?
I'd be shooting for the -4 scx lower with #6 prop shafts!
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 02-12-2013 | 11:29 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: QLD
Default

I would have thought a 1.36 with lower pitch prop would accelerate marginally quicker than 1.5 with higher pitch. Due to the fact that the higher pitch prop is going to slip more and be less efficient until it reaches a certain speed. The lower pitch prop is more efficient at the lower speed (standing start and mid range). They may both even out at peak rpm as long as pitch selection is correct.
This is just my thoughts, I'm no prop guru.
Kurt Hamilton is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.