Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Gear Ratio vs acceleration/speed >

Gear Ratio vs acceleration/speed

Notices

Gear Ratio vs acceleration/speed

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-12-2013, 09:15 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default Gear Ratio vs acceleration/speed

For months now I've been having this conversation with a buddy of mine. He has a 42 Fountain with big procharged power. He has 1.36 Gears in his SCX with SC lower.

He keeps telling me that his problem with acceleration was due to the 1.36 30p prop combo. Because he said the boat accelerated so much better with the 1.5 gear 30P prop (6500RPM topped out). Well, I been trying to tell him you cant compare that scenario, and a more fair comparison would have been the 1.36 with a 26p prop.

Last season with the 1.36 and 30p prop, he turned 6000RPM all out. Which is where he wants to be. So he wants to install 1.5 gears, with 34p props, and he said the boat will hands down be faster and accelerate 10x better. We added about 80HP per side with some changes. So my guess is to stay at 6000RPM he may need to go up 2'' of pitch. I tried suggesting not changing anything since lets see how the boat responds with the engine changes. But he has been told that going to 1.5's will turn it into a MONSTER. I just cant see the gear change being that dramatic. Maybe im wrong.

My questions are for the guys who have ran both setups. I personally have never ran anything other than 1.5 gears in my stuff.

By going to 1.5 36p prop over a 1.36 32p prop setup...

Will the boat accelerate harder, and how much? He seems to think its gonna go from sluggish to neck snapping by making the change?

Will the top speed change??

Which setup would be easier on the drives??
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:35 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,268
Received 239 Likes on 92 Posts
Default

Sluggish to neck snapping I doubt it, I believe the 1:36 with the 32 prop would be easier on the drive, how long wll the drive last if he slams the sticks with either set up? I don't know just sayin.
abones is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:44 PM
  #3  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

He might feel something with a 1.5 and a 32, doubt it will be neck snapping in a 42. What RPM will he see the extra 80 HP ?
GPM is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:48 PM
  #4  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: yorkville,il
Posts: 8,427
Received 87 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

i believe his imco scx drives are 1.3 ratio.
mike tkach is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:50 PM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: yorkville,il
Posts: 8,427
Received 87 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
He might feel something with a 1.5 and a 32, doubt it will be neck snapping in a 42. What RPM will he see the extra 80 HP ?
peak hp of 1195 was at 5900 rpm.
mike tkach is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:52 PM
  #6  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
He might feel something with a 1.5 and a 32, doubt it will be neck snapping in a 42. What RPM will he see the extra 80 HP ?
Actually I was wrong on the 80HP. He picked up like 100FT lbs from 3000-3800, and from 3800-5800 he was up 60-90FT lbs.

HP wise, up about 75HP from 3500-5800. Around 6000RPM he only up about 40HP and 40FT lbs. The goal was more midrange.

Also getting rid of his old carb setup, in favor of some new C&S blow thru's. Hopfully those will clean up his fuel curve, which was just not good for anything. Fat down low and lean up top.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:52 PM
  #7  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default fixx

theirs more to the story,,he is allso going from a -1 to a -3 shorty if im not mistakin...

The boat is going to get from point a to point b faster with the 1.50 then a 1.36 ratio..


I give up,let him figure it out..
FIXX is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:55 PM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mike tkach
i believe his imco scx drives are 1.3 ratio.
Actually it looks like 1.34 according to this?

http://www.mkhammer.com/imco-sc-lowe...-p-302570.html
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:56 PM
  #9  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrfixxall
theirs more to the story,,he is allso going from a -1 to a -3 shorty if im not mistakin...

The boat is going to get from point a to point b faster with the 1.50 then a 1.36 ratio..


I give up,let him figure it out..
Nope. He's keepin the -1 now lol
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 02-12-2013, 09:56 PM
  #10  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,663
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mike tkach
peak hp of 1195 was at 5900 rpm.
Does the HP fall off or could push them to 6100 if need be and have a better hole shot.
GPM is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.