Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
whats truly needed to swap an ls engine >

whats truly needed to swap an ls engine

Notices

whats truly needed to swap an ls engine

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-12-2013 | 02:25 AM
  #61  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: madrid, ia
Default

one other thing I have read a ton about is that the stock rocker arm is prone to throwing our needle bearings. Comp cams makes a trunion upgrade kit to fit the stock rocker arms. Most people are using this kit rather than running aftermarket arms. I figure for the cost its cheap insurance.
sdg0080 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-2013 | 02:15 AM
  #62  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: madrid, ia
Default

On a side note about any of the ls engines. so anyone who's ever had one of these motors knows they consume oil.... usually about a quart every oil change. So, I have been doing a lot of reading and some discovering on my engine build. I would highly recomend installing an oil catch can between the pcv and the intake. I have never seen so much oil built up inside of an intake in my life. it felt like 36 grit sand paper. i soaked my intake for 2 days in purple power and water then another day and a half in dawn ultra and water. i then used a scrub brush to clean out the runners. I had all kinds of stuff come out of that thing. Most everyone on the ls forums are running catch cans and they say it stops their oil consumption.
sdg0080 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-2013 | 09:31 AM
  #63  
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 29
Default

Originally Posted by sdg0080
one other thing I have read a ton about is that the stock rocker arm is prone to throwing our needle bearings. Comp cams makes a trunion upgrade kit to fit the stock rocker arms. Most people are using this kit rather than running aftermarket arms. I figure for the cost its cheap insurance.
If you are going to spend the money, you might as well just buy real roller rockers. They really aren't that much money.
Captain YARRR is offline  
Reply
Old 12-13-2013 | 11:00 PM
  #64  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: madrid, ia
Default

I was going to but the trunions are 130 and real roller rockers are 400-500. Most of the LS guys are simply running the trunions. The stockers are actually very light and very strong, other than the factory needle bearing design. If I was going to build a high rpm screamer i probably would swap the rockers. I'm not trying to cut corners just spending the money where it will do the most good. I could easily drop an extra 1500 on a fast intake and roller rockers and gain maybe 3 mph? The motor itself is mostly stock. other than the valve train, and bigger injectors. I'm going to take a guess at 450 Hp off this build and thats 200 hp over the stock 350 mag that I took out. The wife is being good to me not saying how much I can spend or not spend...lol She said just make sure its reliable. the boat made it back to the dock less than 50% of the time we took it out...lol I should have listened to my gut when I got the boat and gone through the motor...
sdg0080 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-14-2013 | 08:43 AM
  #65  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 659
Likes: 3
From: Brooklyn Park, MN
Default

Honestly, unless the cam is big, run the stockers with a trunion upgrade, way lighter easier to keep the valve train stable. I have a set of jessels on my ls7 and I would swap back but the valves I have are not stock height and the geometry would be way off. Unless its a solid roller with shaft rockers the the stockers with the trunion are the best bet imo. I don't really like any of the non shaft options.
professor_speed is offline  
Reply
Old 12-15-2013 | 08:41 PM
  #66  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: madrid, ia
Default

sounds like you have a pretty mean ls7 in something. In all honesty I probably could have just dropped a stock lq4 motor in the boat and gotten the needed parts to make it mount and been done pretty cheap. Other than the exhaust... i dont want to scare anyone away talking massive money to make the swap happen. I just happen to want to get more performane out of it. I save a ton of money repinning my ecu myself. most places want 400-700 for a harness. I even went as far as to put nylon braided sleeves over the wires and heat shrink the ends of the sleeve. that took forever by the way but looks killer.




I laided it all out the way I wanted it then had to take it apart to fit the sleeve onto it... well worth it in my book. I'll be doing all my wiring in the engine room the same way. after pulling out the factory harness I can see several areas where it was rubbing on something and had worn the wire down to copper.
sdg0080 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-15-2013 | 09:44 PM
  #67  
Fenderjack's Avatar
Pirate of the Chesapeake
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 0
From: North Point Creek, Md.
Default

Do you guys think the 6.0 would have enough power and torque to replace a set of stock 340 HP big blocks in a 10,000 lb deep v offshore boat without going slower ?????? JOHN SR
Fenderjack is offline  
Reply
Old 12-15-2013 | 10:46 PM
  #68  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: madrid, ia
Default

I'll be putting down north of 450 HP with just a cam change, tune and headers. ( I may be conservative on this). These motors can lay down well over 700 HP without forced induction. I know of at least one person who wanted to do twin ls to replace the bbc. Also in the skater forum there is a 24' skater with twin 5.3's hitting I think 105 mph. In my opionon yes I can say twin mild build ls engines will smoke 340 bb any day. shave 300 lbs off each motor and pump them up to 500 HP each, yeah I believe you will love the results. Also the fuel consumption on the new ls engines is far superior to that of the old sbc and bbc.
sdg0080 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-16-2013 | 07:48 AM
  #69  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 105
Likes: 3
From: Valley View, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Fenderjack
Do you guys think the 6.0 would have enough power and torque to replace a set of stock 340 HP big blocks in a 10,000 lb deep v offshore boat without going slower ?????? JOHN SR
As big a fan as I am of the LS platform... a boat that heavy really needs the torque of more cubic inches. Just my 2 cents.
timmoore is offline  
Reply
Old 12-16-2013 | 11:05 AM
  #70  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Kissimmee, Fl.
Default

The LS engine will respond to almost anything and make HP/TQ by accident. And as far as oil consuption, I know the 5.3's had an issue at first, but my LQ4 in my '03 HD hasn't used a drop, and has towed alot. Everyones experiences may vary.
CC230 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.