![]() |
Make it simple and call Bob Madera at Marine Kinetics. He nailed exactly what I wanted and gave me a no BS expectation for performance.
You can tell he lives for this stuff and knows exactly what to do considering whatever goals you have. |
Originally Posted by Captain YARRR
(Post 4089626)
Make it simple and call Bob Madera at Marine Kinetics. He nailed exactly what I wanted and gave me a no BS expectation for performance.
You can tell he lives for this stuff and knows exactly what to do considering whatever goals you have. |
That suks. Sounds like time to sit back and wait...but that's personal advice which you are not asking for and we should not give out.
|
[QUOTE=38special;4090162]That was the plan to start with but sometimes you have to change plans. After making the auto and property insurance payment yesterday I came up short of having enough to even buy the 350 hp cam
Just curious, what are the specs on the 350hp cam |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4090705)
That suks. Sounds like time to sit back and wait...but that's personal advice which you are not asking for and we should not give out.
|
Originally Posted by GPM
(Post 4090712)
Just curious, what are the specs on the 350hp cam
|
It's not that important.
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4083870)
Sure. I'll take a stab it.
It will be much faster if you're wife is driving it. |
Originally Posted by bobl
(Post 4086021)
Just for FYI on this discussion. I just finished dynoing another 6.2 build. It's an early model 6.2 with the 4 bbl type intake. I rebuilt it with forged pistons. Raised the compression to around 9.8. Minor bowl work on the Vortec heads. We used a Comp 270 hydraulic roller. Stock exhaust with stainless replacement risers. It made 380 HP at 5700 RPM, and over 370 from 5200 on up. Torque was 423 at 3900 RPM.That leaves a 500 RPM window from 5200-5700 where the power is pretty much flat. So as with many other 6.2's I've done, that head, cam and exhaust package works really well but pretty much hit it's limit by 5400 RPM, but if you want to turn more rpm it doesn't completely just die, just no real benefit.
Hope this helps, Bob Lloyd Full Throttle Marine Bobl, I have been reading about your great success with the 6.2s for quite some time, and have a question. The build that you speak about above , was the original efi kept , and if so, did it have to be sent off? Also I have a 98 6.2 with the 90mm throttle body and mefi3, would mine be considered the early model with the good intake .? Thanks so much for the advice |
[QUOTE=01Sea;4139999]Bobl, I have been reading about your great success with the 6.2s for quite some time, and have a question. The build that you speak about above , was the original efi kept , and if so, did it have to be sent off? Also I have a 98 6.2 with the 90mm throttle body and mefi3, would mine be considered the early model with the good intake .? Thanks so much for the advice[/QUOT
Yes, yours is a much better candidate.. A good efi intake would still help, just adapt the throttle body to it.The mefi 3 makes it a lot easier to tune. A lot of people can tune them. Bob |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:18 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.