Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Removing CATs on new 8.2L motor >

Removing CATs on new 8.2L motor

Notices

Removing CATs on new 8.2L motor

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-07-2014 | 08:23 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 495
Likes: 23
From: anna maria island,fl
Default

When Florida was requiring inspections, it was done at a Fl State run facility. They only charged a couple bucks and if you failed , no charge for retest. They checked brakes, exhaust, tires, HEADLIGHT AIM,and it wasnt that big a deal or very expensive.
PARASAIL941 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-2014 | 08:30 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 495
Likes: 23
From: anna maria island,fl
Default

On the 8.2's ,If you showed proof the engine was being used for repower and replacing an older motor, you could purchase with cats removed but keep full warranty.
PARASAIL941 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-2014 | 08:38 PM
  #23  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,104
Likes: 3,692
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
How do all the modified vehicles pass inspections?

Seems emissions wouldn't pass and do they pass lifted trucks?


We (NH) have tough rules on lifted trucks now.

If OBDII monitors pass, a modded vehicle passes. Our machines plug directly into the OBDII port. The VIN and monitors are checked and sent directly to the state.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 09-07-2014 | 09:05 PM
  #24  
BUP
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 46
From: Ft. Worth TX
Default

If your hull is a 2009 and back yes you can get a NON CAT engine thru most OEM marine engine manus. In California its 2007 and back. This is for repowering bellow 500 hp. Merc and Volvo will need your Hull ID (HIN) to make sure about the repower CAT or No CAT. Any marine engine 500 hp and above currently do not mandate a CAT engine.

This all started by CARB (in California) for all model year 2008 engines below 500 hp and by the EPA with the rest of the USA for model year 2010 all marine engines under 500 hp. The 4.3 - 262 CID did have a pass until year 2012 model year because of green carbon credits that the OEM marine engines builders had in the kitty persay. .

Next Malibu boats and Indmar Marine engines started using CATS in the marine engine apps before any mandated was in place. They Indmar and Malibu boats stated catalyst engines for model year 2006. They both had reasons for doing so because of CO poisoning that the wakeboarder and wake surfer was experiencing.

Actually a couple of people died because of CO poisoning from wake surfing and a girl hanging out on the swim platform watching a person wakeboarding over a long period of time.

Malibu and Indmar looked at it as a health, life / death, cleaner air, cleaner water, quit engine running especially behind the boat issues. Hence the reason they did CAT engines before it was mandated. Also they knew the CAT engine was going to be mandated soon in the USA anyways so why not be the first for rec / ski gas engine boats and market the heck out of the safer issues for buying a wakeboard boat and CAT engine package combo..

Last edited by BUP; 09-07-2014 at 09:17 PM.
BUP is offline  
Reply
Old 09-08-2014 | 04:16 AM
  #25  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 39
From: Further South East of Dome Island
Default

You are part of the problem so I would expect you to understand.
Pismo10 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-08-2014 | 04:34 PM
  #26  
BUP
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 46
From: Ft. Worth TX
Default

P10 I am sorry but kind of lost here about the " you" and "problem" post. I guess I am some sort of a problem. Really man, I think an ex girlfriend told me that samething at one time. Anyways if this was thrown my way, this is my reply. If not disregard.
BUP is offline  
Reply
Old 09-08-2014 | 07:54 PM
  #27  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,104
Likes: 3,692
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

BUP - I think it's directed at me.

I'm okay with it as a 2002 Chevy 1500 sits next to me. Frame is rotted enough the middle crossmember is over 75% torn away. It's the frame that's ripped, not the crossmember. Just Not enough metal left. Fuel lines are leaking. Cannot remove them from the nylon lines that come from the tank. Corrosion enlarged that part of the metal lines that far.

Looks like the Leaf spring shackles rotted on it a few years ago where the springs broke up thru the bed. We've seen this many times and usually we stop the customer from driving off as they apparently knew about it driving in. You don't NOT notice this driving.

It's Here because it needs an inspection sticker. Not because the owner noticed anything wrong .Should I just pass it and let it go down the road ? Should we not have Inspections so this could be left to drive down a public road ? What about the safety of the driver and occupants ?

I have to sleep at night. So , my actions will be clear.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2014 | 09:52 AM
  #28  
BUP
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 46
From: Ft. Worth TX
Default

SB I hear you. We have very tough emissions tests here to pass and the state will help you after 3 tries if you failed the testing. Without a current inspection sticker on your front windshield you will get a ticket / fine. Thank whomever.

Just what I want to do especially after working my azz off all day in 110 degree heat is to be stuck behind some jack for 2 hours that is gassing me out in rush hour traffic because his piece of crap can't pass emissions or is from a state that has no emissions testing while I pay to have all my autos pass current testing. And believe me very easy in DFW to get stuck in traffic for 2 hours at a complete stand still. This place is driving CF 14 hours out of the day, every freaking day.

Last edited by BUP; 09-10-2014 at 10:39 AM.
BUP is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2014 | 11:34 AM
  #29  
donzi matt's Avatar
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,358
Likes: 31
From: Moultonborough NH
Default

Removed from a 2001 Dodge Dakota today, caught during a state inspection, customer said the brakes felt fine.[ATTACH=CONFIG]529212[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]529213[/ATTACH]

This is why I say at least in NH annual inspections are a very necessary thing.
Attached Thumbnails Removing CATs on new 8.2L motor-img_1357.jpg   Removing CATs on new 8.2L motor-img_1358.jpg  

Last edited by donzi matt; 09-10-2014 at 11:38 AM.
donzi matt is offline  
Reply
Old 09-10-2014 | 11:40 AM
  #30  
Gold Member
15 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,748
Likes: 869
From: Delray Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by donzi matt
Removed from a 2001 Dodge Dakota today, caught during a state inspection, customer said the brakes felt fine.[ATTACH=CONFIG]529212[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]529213[/ATTACH]

This is why I say at least in NH annual inspections are a very necessary thing.
That had at least 20,000 miles left on it...
Keith Atlanta is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.