Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Cam Suggestions for a 540 >

Cam Suggestions for a 540

Notices

Cam Suggestions for a 540

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-14-2015 | 12:27 PM
  #121  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 570
Likes: 47
From: cincinnati,oh.
Default

Victor ported by Wilson manifolds and a 1050 dominator.
fbc25el is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 12:40 PM
  #122  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 277
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 22MTR
To be clear I am actually looking at 139671 which is the same profile as 741 but on 114 degree centers. Also I am using 335 heads. What are you running for an intake ??
AFR 335's on a 540 in that rpm range are way too big. You'll never get any port velocity and if you're running a 1050 carb it makes things even worse. Only way to really make any power will be with a custom cam...short duration higher lift but that tends to be hard on valve train.
horsepower1 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 12:53 PM
  #123  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Originally Posted by horsepower1
AFR 335's on a 540 in that rpm range are way too big. You'll never get any port velocity and if you're running a 1050 carb it makes things even worse. Only way to really make any power will be with a custom cam...short duration higher lift but that tends to be hard on valve train.
Well that is what I fell into so that is what I will be running. Agreed that port velocities will not be optimal but for what I paid for the whole package I can make it work... Also I am planning on running EFI at this point as I see considerable changes in altitude when I change locations ( greater than 4000' ). The leading candidate at this point is the holly single plane system.
22MTR is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 12:58 PM
  #124  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Theres three different cams being talked about here.

139671 (525EFI cam)

236/244 114 LSA
.610/.632

Intake open 9
Intake closes 47
Exhaust open 61
Exhaust close 3

168741 also referred to as the "741" cam.

236/244 112 LSA
.610/.632

Intake open 11
Intake close 45
Exhaust open 59
Exhaust close 5

139021 (cam FBC25EL had)

234/242 112 LSA
.610/.632

Intake open 10
Intake close 44
Exhaust open 58
Exhaust close 4

The 525EFI cam, will hold on RPM a bit longer, than both the 741, and 021. Also, there is more to where the HP "peaks at", than just the camshaft. Cylinder head, induction , exhaust, can play a factor too.

I had a 741 crane in a 540, with iron merlin heads, dart single plane, and 1050 dominator. Peaked around 5600rpm on the dyno.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 01:08 PM
  #125  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 2
From: Metro Detroit
Default

What are the specs on the heads on a 525 EFI?
Pwraddr is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 01:11 PM
  #126  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Pwraddr
What are the specs on the heads on a 525 EFI?
Edelbrock 315 CC . Flow is not much better than a chevy iron rect port head.

Valve Lift .100" .200" .300" .400" .500" .600"
Intake 76 146 212 255 294 314 -
Exhaust 70 132 156 181 207 228
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 01:11 PM
  #127  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
Default

Edelbrock marine standard port height, nothing too special. Too lazy to look it up
JRider is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 01:16 PM
  #128  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 2
From: Metro Detroit
Default

I see, thanks!

Wonder what kind of increase you could get changing the 525Efi head to the dart pro 1 310 head? Any guess? Or should the 325 head be better?

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Edelbrock 315 CC . Flow is not much better than a chevy iron rect port head.

Valve Lift .100" .200" .300" .400" .500" .600"
Intake 76 146 212 255 294 314 -
Exhaust 70 132 156 181 207 228
Pwraddr is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 01:22 PM
  #129  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 277
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 22MTR
Well that is what I fell into so that is what I will be running. Agreed that port velocities will not be optimal but for what I paid for the whole package I can make it work... Also I am planning on running EFI at this point as I see considerable changes in altitude when I change locations ( greater than 4000' ). The leading candidate at this point is the holly single plane system.
IMO that's a poor excuse for building a poor combination given all the time and expense you'll have invested before you're done. You could easily sell the 335's and replace them with the right head for your combination. EVERYTHING will benefit from it especially if you're going to see altitude changes like that. A lazy induction makes an engine considerably more sensitive to those sorts of changes. JMO.
horsepower1 is offline  
Reply
Old 11-14-2015 | 03:10 PM
  #130  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 14
From: MI
Default

Originally Posted by Pwraddr
I see, thanks!

Wonder what kind of increase you could get changing the 525Efi head to the dart pro 1 310 head? Any guess? Or should the 325 head be better?
In my unprofessional opinion, forced induction would be a better way to more power than heads. Bang for buck a lot better but your XRs might not like them after a while. Or you can just leave it alone
JRider is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.