Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
500EFI Intake modification/adaptation to Pro Flo EFI >

500EFI Intake modification/adaptation to Pro Flo EFI

Notices

500EFI Intake modification/adaptation to Pro Flo EFI

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-23-2016 | 09:07 AM
  #61  
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE, LOTO
Default

Stock cam stock lifters. Isky Springs. Yes I did increase plenum volume a lot. The hp curve technically never peaked. He said it did loose a very slight amount down low, but he said it was such a small amount you would never notice it in the boat.
C.I.M. is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2016 | 09:12 AM
  #62  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,598
Likes: 1,168
From: taxachusetts
Default

Originally Posted by C.I.M.
Stock cam stock lifters. Isky Springs. Yes I did increase plenum volume a lot. The hp curve technically never peaked. He said it did loose a very slight amount down low, but he said it was such a small amount you would never notice it in the boat.
any pics of the intake mods?
sutphen 30 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-23-2016 | 09:24 AM
  #63  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 3,687
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

I just found a post I made years back. I ran pipemax for intake tuning suggestions on a 502 making target max hp at 6000rpm.
Here's some info to help you with the intakes:

- Induction System Tuned Lengths - ( Cylinder Head Port + Manifold Runner )
1st Harmonic= 34.302 (usually this Length is never used)
2nd Harmonic= 19.469 (some Sprint Engines and Factory OEM's w/Injectors)
3rd Harmonic= 13.592 (ProStock or Comp SheetMetal Intake)
4th Harmonic= 10.698 (Single-plane Intakes , less Torque)
5th Harmonic= 8.680 (Torque is reduced, even though Tuned Length)
6th Harmonic= 7.302 (Torque is reduced, even though Tuned Length)
7th Harmonic= 6.302 (Torque is greatly reduced, even though Tuned Length)
8th Harmonic= 5.543 (Torque is greatly reduced, even though Tuned Length)
Note> 2nd and 3rd Harmonics typically create the most Peak Torque
4th Harmonic is used to package Induction System underneath Hood

Plenum Runner Minimum Recommended Entry Area = 3.197 to 3.597 Sq.Inch
Plenum Runner Average Recommended Entry Area = 3.676 Sq.Inch
Plenum Runner Maximum Recommended Entry Area = 3.755 to 4.443 Sq.Inch

Minimum Plenum Volume CC = 1240.6 [typically for Single-Plane Intakes]
Minimum Plenum Volume CID= 75.7 [typically for Single-Plane Intakes]
Maximum Plenum Volume CC = 8861.2 [typically for Tunnel Ram Intakes]
Maximum Plenum Volume CID= 540.7 [typically for Tunnel Ram Intakes]

================================================== ======
CSA = Cross Sectional Area

350 FPS Velocity CSA= 2.054 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Port Sonic-Choke with HP Loss
330 FPS Velocity CSA= 2.180 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Port Sonic-Choke with HP Loss
311 FPS Velocity CSA= 2.313 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Smallest Useable Port CSA
300 FPS Velocity CSA= 2.398 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Recommended Smallest Port CSA
285 FPS Velocity CSA= 2.524 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Recommended Smallest Port CSA
260 FPS Velocity CSA= 2.767 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Recommended Port CSA
250 FPS Velocity CSA= 2.877 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Recommended Port CSA
240 FPS Velocity CSA= 2.997 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Largest Intake Port Entry CSA
220 FPS Velocity CSA= 3.270 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Largest Intake Port Entry CSA
210 FPS Velocity CSA= 3.426 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Torque Loss + Reversion
200 FPS Velocity CSA= 3.597 sq.in. at 6000 RPM Torque Loss + Reversion

Last edited by SB; 04-23-2016 at 09:28 AM.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2016 | 10:36 AM
  #64  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,865
Likes: 793
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

That's awesome. I need to play with that. Those runner CSAs are what we should actually be looking at when everyone starts furiously debating head runner CCs.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2016 | 09:52 PM
  #65  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

Thats why im planning on cutting runners out of upper plenum and in lower intake to achieve 13.5" or so to valve. Would be interesting if cim had used bigger cam and better lifters.
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 05-12-2016 | 05:31 PM
  #66  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C.I.M.
Yes they were apples to apples.the were the uncorrected numbers. The weather was so good the correction wasn't changing it more than a couple hp. It made 40 hp more straight off the start. Then with some tuning we ended up with the 61. And yes it kept pulling all the way to 6000. I would really like to see what it would do with a big cid motor.
C.I.M I am in the middle of a 525efi to 540 rebuild. I am interested in this modification as i am trying to retain the look and function of the 525efi albeit with more hp.
ja2750 is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-2016 | 10:00 AM
  #67  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: rogers ark
Default

SO I have received my 500efi intakes back from having the front of the intake machined and same for the throttle body opened from a dual blade to single. I now have them installed and tested on the boat .

specs on the motors as known , 500 / 540ci short deck , flattop pistons , cam size unknown , heads are dart pro1 345 cc , 500 efi intakes . dyno sheet was 685 ( do not believe this engine is over 600hp )

after a quick retune to check air flow ratio ................. I do not notice any speed gains ! or performance changes .



SO SAVE YOUR MONEY AND CHANGE THE INTAKES TO A BETTER FLOWING INTAKE
kennyd is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-2016 | 11:02 AM
  #68  
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
Platinum Member
Community Builder
10 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 11,428
Likes: 3,955
From: Midwest & T-Rock
Default

Originally Posted by kennyd
SO I have received my 500efi intakes back from having the front of the intake machined and same for the throttle body opened from a dual blade to single. I now have them installed and tested on the boat .

specs on the motors as known , 500 / 540ci short deck , flattop pistons , cam size unknown , heads are dart pro1 345 cc , 500 efi intakes . dyno sheet was 685 ( do not believe this engine is over 600hp )

after a quick retune to check air flow ratio ................. I do not notice any speed gains ! or performance changes .



SO SAVE YOUR MONEY AND CHANGE THE INTAKES TO A BETTER FLOWING INTAKE
Who did the work on the intake & TB, are you saying this was a waist of time & $$$
F-2 Speedy is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-2016 | 11:18 AM
  #69  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,100
Likes: 3,687
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

I took it as he installed bigger single blade tbody and machined tbody entrance to intake manifold. Nothing else.
SB is offline  
Reply
Old 05-13-2016 | 11:29 AM
  #70  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
From: rogers ark
Default

Originally Posted by 33outlawsst
Who did the work on the intake & TB, are you saying this was a waist of time & $$$
yes , I think it was a waist of money and time
kennyd is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.