![]() |
horsepower1,u and i did not see i to i when you first appeared as horsepower1.i have been sitting back and reading what you post.i told you i am not one to jump on the band wagon and i form my own opinion,well sir you have proven to me that you are for real,and that you post good,factual information.my advice to you would be ,don,t let people like zone suck you into bickering.some people can be shown in black&white but they will still believe what the say to be correct because when someone thinks they know everything they can no longer learn anything.i want to apoligize for posting what you sent me in a pm,i was wrong for doing that and i will never make that mistake again.i have not been posting much lately because i am tired of listening to the bs that has been flying around here lately.
|
Remember an engine is a compromise. If you are not working on the bottleneck your not going to gain anything. If the heads are not holding you back, putting on better flowing heads is not going to help you. Also don't go on the internet and tell everyone those better flowing heads don't work because you didn't see a gain, you didn't need them. In another application they would work well. From my limited experience - If your going to miss on your combo you want to miss on the small side on heads and cams. It gives you a responsive engine with midrange torque and usually better idle.
|
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4377123)
horsepower1,u and i did not see i to i when you first appeared as horsepower1.i have been sitting back and reading what you post.i told you i am not one to jump on the band wagon and i form my own opinion,well sir you have proven to me that you are for real,and that you post good,factual information.my advice to you would be ,don,t let people like zone suck you into bickering.some people can be shown in black&white but they will still believe what the say to be correct because when someone thinks they know everything they can no longer learn anything.i want to apoligize for posting what you sent me in a pm,i was wrong for doing that and i will never make that mistake again.i have not been posting much lately because i am tired of listening to the bs that has been flying around here lately.
Originally Posted by mike tkach
i have always used dart heads but recently did a build with afr 315 cnc heads.the quality&performance we saw with the afr,s was as good as the dart,s and about a grand cheeper.pretty sure i will be using the afr,s from now on.
|
no need to wonder,just ask.522 cu in supercharged engine,10 lbs boost,6800 rpm max,heads&cam speced by bob madera,this engine was a total sucess.if this was a n/a build 305 with cnc chaimber would have been used.
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4376124)
Big words coming from a guy, who's offshore experience consists of .................well, NOTHING :lolhit:.
A guy who has yet to hit the water with his 24ft'er he bought, or complete his first marine engine build, and tells everyone to go to his "carb guy", because he did such a good job on his carb for this offshore vessel. Please, lets all listen to you're advice, on how to dial in a 40ft offshore boat ...you have such vast experience! And I don't work on my own stuff? Who's pot you been smoking???!!! Wait wait.....here come the truck driver insults..... How about you post something you built YOURSELF? Or, maybe just google search some more of other folks info and work and post it as if it was yours. :angry-smiley-038: Funny that mike t had to post your piston to bore clearance here recently. One would think a guy who spends so much time pontificating about engines here would know what his own stuff measures.:grinser010: |
Originally Posted by vintage chromoly
(Post 4377141)
I see you dug up some pics of my first boat restoration. Nicely done.
How about you post something you built YOURSELF? Or, maybe just google search some more of other folks info and work and post it as if it was yours. :angry-smiley-038: Funny that mike t had to post your piston to bore clearance here recently. One would think a guy who spends so much time pontificating about engines here would know what his own stuff measures.:grinser010: |
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4377123)
horsepower1,u and i did not see i to i when you first appeared as horsepower1.i have been sitting back and reading what you post.i told you i am not one to jump on the band wagon and i form my own opinion,well sir you have proven to me that you are for real,and that you post good,factual information.my advice to you would be ,don,t let people like zone suck you into bickering.some people can be shown in black&white but they will still believe what the say to be correct because when someone thinks they know everything they can no longer learn anything.i want to apoligize for posting what you sent me in a pm,i was wrong for doing that and i will never make that mistake again.i have not been posting much lately because i am tired of listening to the bs that has been flying around here lately.
Great post Mike! |
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4377139)
no need to wonder,just ask.522 cu in supercharged engine,10 lbs boost,6800 rpm max,heads&cam speced by bob madera,this engine was a total sucess.if this was a n/a build 305 with cnc chaimber would have been used.
|
Originally Posted by vintage chromoly
(Post 4377141)
I see you dug up some pics of my first boat restoration. Nicely done.
How about you post something you built YOURSELF? Or, maybe just google search some more of other folks info and work and post it as if it was yours. :angry-smiley-038: Funny that mike t had to post your piston to bore clearance here recently. One would think a guy who spends so much time pontificating about engines here would know what his own stuff measures.:grinser010: |
Mike I hope you don't stop posting because it's you and a few others I look for when I'm looking advice on here.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.