Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
489 build critique >

489 build critique

Notices

489 build critique

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-22-2016 | 08:39 PM
  #21  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,041
Likes: 712
From: Toledo Oh
Default

Would the 110
LSA need dry exhaust??
phragle is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2016 | 08:56 PM
  #22  
GPM
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 93
From: Pa
Default

I ran the Ultradyn version that was slightly bigger in my 454 without any reversion issues, even with Captains choice. I wasn't suggesting the cam just trying to show what Mercruiser used to get 440hp. Thinking the 224 may be a little small to make 450hp.

Last edited by GPM; 02-22-2016 at 09:03 PM.
GPM is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2016 | 09:18 PM
  #23  
vintage chromoly's Avatar
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 18
From: cleveland ohio
Default

I had a 224 [email protected] and 530ish lift on a 110lsa in my 306 SBF in the little searay I had.
It had GLM cast iron center riser manifolds. I welded about 3" extensions on the inner pipes (they had pressed in 2.5" exhaust pipe I welded to)

I'm not saying it's right, just that that's what I did and it ran really strong for several years. Actually, it's still running great for the guy I sold it to.

Truth be told, I'd bet it has slight reversion, probably just not enough to cause a catastrophic failure.
vintage chromoly is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2016 | 09:19 PM
  #24  
vintage chromoly's Avatar
Gold Member
10 Year Member
Gold Member
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,643
Likes: 18
From: cleveland ohio
Default

I will say, the exhaust sounded really nice and choppy with the 110LSA.
vintage chromoly is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2016 | 10:08 PM
  #25  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

I would guess close to the stock 502 415 hp. Same cam correct? I think peak torque is around 2,900. Personally id prop it for about 4,800 max.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 02-22-2016 | 10:11 PM
  #26  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 3
From: OFallon,Mo.
Default

Originally Posted by mggdoors
Really only 375-400? So what is holding it back.
Small cam, small valves, carb is minimal. Maybe 400hp.

Last edited by picklenjim; 02-22-2016 at 10:15 PM.
picklenjim is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-2016 | 01:13 AM
  #27  
Griff's Avatar
Charter Member # 55
25 Year Member
Charter Member
Super Moderators
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 20,272
Likes: 2,513
From: Omaha/LOTO
Default

Originally Posted by mggdoors
Really only 375-400? So what is holding it back.
The cam is small and the carb is small. Its stock 454/502 mag roller cam and the same cfm carb as 454/502 mag.

Carbed 502mag was 390hp at the crank.
Griff is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-2016 | 05:32 AM
  #28  
SB
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,154
Likes: 3,714
From: On A Dirt Floor
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
I would guess close to the stock 502 415 hp. Same cam correct? I think peak torque is around 2,900. Personally id prop it for about 4,800 max.
Yup, same cam as 502MPI/415hp

Mercruiser 454 502 Mag Roller
Merc# 431-850478 / GM#12551622
.004 300*/ 300*
.006 288*/288*
.050” 225*/225*
.200” 125*/125*
Lift .483”/. 483”
ICL 109*
LSA 115.5*

Originally Posted by mggdoors
Currently building 2 engines. 489 gen6 stokers. L29 heads pocket ported with incomes exhaust valves. 12551622 cams 224/224 .483 .483 lift. Air gap intakes. Holley 750 vac sec. Pertronix dist. Hge aluminum exhaust. Rod and main bearings are .002. Ring gap .018. How much power. Any issues?
SB is online now  
Reply
Old 02-23-2016 | 10:30 AM
  #29  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Should be a nice clean and simple reliable package. Without a doubt it could be woken up with just a cam change but.... Heads should support another .100 lift I would think and prolly pick up an extra 40 plus horse easily without hurting reliability etc. Regardless I think everyone's on board with the 400 Plus or minus. I would imagine comp is near 9:1? At least you can go out and enjoy the day. Drink some beer, looks at some bikinis, and call it a day. Leave the tools in the shop.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 02-23-2016 | 01:37 PM
  #30  
Thread Starter
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 493
Likes: 17
From: San Tan Valley AZ
Default

I know this. Desktop dyno is showing 415 hp 480 tq at 4500 399hp 418 tq 5000. But low end at 2000 is 612tq Don't know how accurate it is and don't know what exhaust would flow like so set it as open exhaust small tube headers. With large tube I'm in the 460hp 4500 425 5k. What cam would you recommend for this combo with the stock exhaust that is reversion safe
Originally Posted by getrdunn
Should be a nice clean and simple reliable package. Without a doubt it could be woken up with just a cam change but.... Heads should support another .100 lift I would think and prolly pick up an extra 40 plus horse easily without hurting reliability etc. Regardless I think everyone's on board with the 400 Plus or minus. I would imagine comp is near 9:1? At least you can go out and enjoy the day. Drink some beer, looks at some bikinis, and call it a day. Leave the tools in the shop.
mggdoors is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.