Off the shelf Cam- Dyno results
#31
I looked at going out the transom but just not enough height above water to make it work so I "fixed" the stock water lift mufflers

[ATTACH=CONFIG]556462[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]556463[/ATTACH]
#32
Registered

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 2
From: West Michigan
If GM roller lifters work with this size cam, why are guys spending more than 2x's the money on Morel and Johnson lifters in this kind of build? I get it on big dollar full out high RPM builds, but this is normal guy stuff and I'm curious why more don't use the GM lifter?
#33
Marketing
#35
[QUOTE=Aqua Banshee;4450333]Thanks for the info. I thought I was crazy with my slip numbers, but there identical to yours. I have a hard time believing that it was supposed to run 53 stock new.[/a
Agreed no idea how they claim 53 with 415 horse per side seems impossible.
Agreed no idea how they claim 53 with 415 horse per side seems impossible.
#38
#39
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,155
Likes: 3,714
From: On A Dirt Floor
#40
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Nice respectable build especially considering out of the box 308's. Job well done. Awesome torque all the way through. Thumbs to you. Now just curious as to your decision with your cam choice over the 741 being so close yet different? More than like the peak rpm/hp. Regardless great choice.
Did you end up more? Less? Or about what you aiming for?
Did you end up more? Less? Or about what you aiming for?
Last edited by getrdunn; 06-16-2016 at 03:51 PM.


