|
I believe way back when, considering his tough to move boat, was low 240 I and mid 240 exhaust.....I'll have to look back at that thread again as I don't remember exactly what I said then. Give me a few.
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4517522)
I believe way back when, considering his tough to move boat, was low 240 I and mid 240 exhaust.....I'll have to look back at that thread again as I don't remember exactly what I said then. Give me a few.
|
Yes, clearly that worked lol ..
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4517523)
So pretty much what madera gave him
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4517523)
So pretty much what madera gave him
I was actually in agreement with the below quote which was on 1st or 2nd page pre build) and thus only replied to his other cam comments later when he thought at the time his 241 at .050" (post build) was too big. Edit in: I would have not agreed with the 'used' part of it though. I personally don't like the idea of used valvetrain pieces.
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4220227)
I tried to reply, your box is full lol
As of now looking at 242/[email protected] 112 LSA .630 lift... I can get 2 used in good shape, made 690 hp with AFR heads. |
So, what do you say I should have now? Just curious because you were way off before... yes I thought maybe it was too big back then, I thought it wasn't pulling up too to get rpm range and it wasn't, but turns out from being too small I learned along since then, all 5 cam guys said wtf is there a 241/246 in a 540 with afr heads for? That's a 509 ci cam not a 540, I'm sure crane, billet cams, Erson, crower, cam motion, comp, and joe, are all stupid and you know what I need.
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4517528)
Duration wise, yes.
I was actually in agreement with the below quote which was on 1st or 2nd page pre build) and thus only replied to his other cam comments later when he thought at the time his 241 at .050" (post build) was too big. |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4517520)
I see alot of advice and criticism, but really not anyone throwing out camshaft specs or anything. Just curious. |
but then again,,I am,,"bottom of the page racin" :D
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4517529)
That's a 509 ci cam not a 540, I'm sure crane, billet cams, Erson, crower, cam motion, comp, and joe, are all stupid and you know what I need.
|
Originally Posted by sutphen 30
(Post 4517535)
I believe I've always said it was to small duration and would have gone in the mid 250's w/ 8° split min.kinda like what I ran in my 454's.:D
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...recipes-3.html
Originally Posted by sutphen 30
(Post 4221096)
heres one
canfield 320's unmolested,10.3-1 compression,single plane w/ dominator(brand eludes me now) and unlike the magical 741 engine,the cam we needed was 248,258,ls112,.629",.629".on the dyno w/ dyno headers made 670hp,,with the dana marine exhuast it made 692hp.enoungh to push a 33 sutphen to a constant and easy 93mph. ignition system was simple small cap hei and truck coil.I told him to ask for 93 gmc 350 truck parts at napa. |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4517538)
What the heck ? I think there may be some typing for communication issues going on here. Did I call anyone stupid on this cam talk ? Man o man.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:10 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.