|
Lol sorry buddy but man we learning a lot hahaha
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4484192)
I'm pretty sure, Tim's engine builds, have taken at least, 14 months off my time on this planet. I'm going to need to see a specialist soon.
|
Those normally pretty tall no?
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4484179)
tim,how about a dual quad manifold with a pair of 850s
|
You needed to do that,^^^^^^^^ remember what you said in post one ?? that was really uncalled for
|
You probably saw this.
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4484208)
Wont ever see 80 without blowers...
|
Originally Posted by Full Force
(Post 4484211)
Those normally pretty tall no?
|
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4484252)
some but not all.
|
Yes Billy's boat, he's got 3's that's 2" shorter X, then engines he had were a tad over 700 also... He offered them to me when I started building mine... Hindsight.... Ya well haha
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4484221)
Can't confirm but thought I'd post.
|
3's aren't 2" shorter than trs
|
Same? I was told they are, then the 3a and 4a is 2" shorter over a 3..?
Originally Posted by Unlimited jd
(Post 4484284)
3's aren't 2" shorter than trs
|
To see 80 with Trs you would not do it unless maybe you have 800+ N/A HP, and at that point your lucky if the Trs lived enough to get it there haha
A buddy years ago had 830 hp in a scarabIII WITH TRS... Struggled to see 82, and it's way lighter then a mistress... Personally I think the huge bullet and depth of the drive is just too much drag at 80+ |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.