how much power can stainless marine take
#11
For that I would go with Thunder n Lightning Headers/Manifolds; http://www.diamondperformanceparts.c...cat=282&page=1
A 598" I built with T&L's. https://youtu.be/u-5P0vw1UqQ
Blown the Gen II's are ok with the right pipes but really need Gen III's. NA, the Thunders are the way to go!
#12
Registered
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 688
Likes: 2
From: Annapolis Md
On that combo i would guess about 40-50hp difference,the big n/a engines really like headers they really like the big tubes 2 1/8 now if it were a blown 509 making 700 the headers would be good for 20 or so at best
#13
Scrap the SM's.
For that I would go with Thunder n Lightning Headers/Manifolds; http://www.diamondperformanceparts.c...cat=282&page=1
A 598" I built with T&L's. https://youtu.be/u-5P0vw1UqQ
Blown the Gen II's are ok with the right pipes but really need Gen III's. NA, the Thunders are the way to go!
For that I would go with Thunder n Lightning Headers/Manifolds; http://www.diamondperformanceparts.c...cat=282&page=1
A 598" I built with T&L's. https://youtu.be/u-5P0vw1UqQ
Blown the Gen II's are ok with the right pipes but really need Gen III's. NA, the Thunders are the way to go!
sounds like a swap cam
#14
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
How about a blown 540, making 900-950?
#15
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,154
Likes: 3,714
From: On A Dirt Floor
#17
My buddys pro charged 509's have stock HP500 Gils, with boat running 107, they gotta be making 825-850 HP, seems that exhaust is fine for him, he researched it years ago, everyone said with the boost it would not matter much at all... I think boost is a totally different animal..
#18
All about personal preference I suppose.
Headers look like "money" because they cost you "money" and lots of "money headaches" down the road.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]563854[/ATTACH]
Headers look like "money" because they cost you "money" and lots of "money headaches" down the road.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]563854[/ATTACH]
Last edited by Panther; 01-17-2017 at 07:53 PM. Reason: add pic
#19
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
I personally dont think those thunder n lightning manifolds look bad. I mean sure,stainless tube headers look cooler, but its not like the GIL or SM regular manifolds are pure sex. At least imo.
#20
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
For low to mid range power, a 2.06 to 2.131 diameter primary, with 18.8 inch x 3.829 to 4.079 diameter collector.
For mid to upper rpm power, a 2.206 to 2.331 diameter primary, with 18.8 inch x 4.079 to 4.579 diameter collector.
Thats a mile, wait, 10 miles, away from a typical stainless marine standard manifold. In the car world, if you stuffed a 750hp 572ci big block in your car, and ran a 1 7/8" shorty header, with a 3" inch collector, someone would smack you across the cheek.

I believe MER Performance recently dynoed a 650ish hp 509 build. Made close to 640 with the 2.25 dyno headers. Bolting the stainless marine manfolds on, it made right about 600hp, and lost a bunch of torque as well. About 30ft lbs I think at peak tq .
Last edited by MILD THUNDER; 01-17-2017 at 08:13 PM.




