Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Supercharged 540 Camshaft >

Supercharged 540 Camshaft

Notices

Supercharged 540 Camshaft

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-20-2016 | 10:13 PM
  #11  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Icdedpenis's engines made close to 900hp at 6200 if i recall. At 5500, they were making 840ish hp.

The merlin heads will probably be your biggest restriction. Did you have the heads flowed ?

I really wouldnt be worried about "blowing raw fuel out the exhaust", or losing sleep over the 741 vs 771 cam. If those heads flow like i think they do, im betting youd prob be better off with something like a 651 244/256 cam, to help make up for the head flow. If i recall the IE ratio on those heads is pretty poor out of the box, and would prob really like a cam that has a large split in duration like the 651 cam. The 651 cam, might not be the best choice when using a head that has an excellent IE ratio, and low boost.

With that being said, any of those cams listed in this thread, will work, and probably make enough power for you to chit your pants in that hull.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 12-20-2016 | 10:55 PM
  #12  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,439
Likes: 94
From: yorkville,il
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Icdedpenis's engines made close to 900hp at 6200 if i recall. At 5500, they were making 840ish hp.

The merlin heads will probably be your biggest restriction. Did you have the heads flowed ?

I really wouldnt be worried about "blowing raw fuel out the exhaust", or losing sleep over the 741 vs 771 cam. If those heads flow like i think they do, im betting youd prob be better off with something like a 651 244/256 cam, to help make up for the head flow. If i recall the IE ratio on those heads is pretty poor out of the box, and would prob really like a cam that has a large split in duration like the 651 cam. The 651 cam, might not be the best choice when using a head that has an excellent IE ratio, and low boost.

With that being said, any of those cams listed in this thread, will work, and probably make enough power for you to chit your pants in that hull.
i agree that the extra exhaust duration will help a head with poor exhaust flow but it worked with my dart 320,s as well.i believe the exhaust manifold or header is an extension of the exhaust port and can also restrict flow.
mike tkach is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2016 | 07:43 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by powermizer
what rpm is that hp at? Comp cams gave me advice for one. Not figuring out how to show it. Pretty small. 230 intake 242 exhaust 538 542 lift 113 separation.
It's hard for me to absorb that Comp would suggest a cam like that for a 540 N/A let alone a blown application!! dosen't pass the smell test if you know What I'm thinking.........
C1000 is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2016 | 07:49 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 8
From: bel air, md
Default

Originally Posted by powermizer
what rpm is that hp at? Comp cams gave me advice for one. Not figuring out how to show it. Pretty small. 230 intake 242 exhaust 538 542 lift 113 separation.
Who at Comp gave you this recommendation?
Black Baja is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2016 | 11:04 AM
  #15  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for the advice from all. his name is Jeffrey Peritore. I guess my biggest concern is having such a low cruise rpm. I have to believe that at such a low rpm 2200-2500 the events are happening so slow that a boosted engine would blow some gas mixture out the exhaust with the bigger cams with more overlap. Thanks again for the help.
powermizer is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2016 | 11:13 AM
  #16  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,318
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

Mild thunder is correct, out of the box merlin heads have a very weak exhaust port, ported, thats a different story, I struggled to make 700 hp years ago with untouched ones on a blown 540, fwiw.
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2016 | 11:17 AM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Icdedpenis's engines made close to 900hp at 6200 if i recall. At 5500, they were making 840ish hp.

The merlin heads will probably be your biggest restriction. Did you have the heads flowed ?

I really wouldnt be worried about "blowing raw fuel out the exhaust", or losing sleep over the 741 vs 771 cam. If those heads flow like i think they do, im betting youd prob be better off with something like a 651 244/256 cam, to help make up for the head flow. If i recall the IE ratio on those heads is pretty poor out of the box, and would prob really like a cam that has a large split in duration like the 651 cam. The 651 cam, might not be the best choice when using a head that has an excellent IE ratio, and low boost.

With that being said, any of those cams listed in this thread, will work, and probably make enough power for you to chit your pants in that hull.
I have not had them flowed. there is some pocket work done on them. As I said I wasn't looking for every MPH out of this thing, but if I could go with a little less overlap using a better flowing head I would be up for doing it. one concern that I have is that the boat holds 60 gals of gas, and we want to take it to Lake Powell, so I am trying to get half way decent MPG. I know it sounds silly. I crack myself up just thinking about it. A guy builds a 540 with a blower and wants good fuel mileage. lol
powermizer is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2016 | 11:27 AM
  #18  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by articfriends
Mild thunder is correct, out of the box merlin heads have a very weak exhaust port, ported, thats a different story, I struggled to make 700 hp years ago with untouched ones on a blown 540, fwiw.
I was looking at the Dart pro 1 heads. It looks like TFS heads in the same size, out of the box made the same power. Decent price on the TFS. I only use the boat in fresh water, but still worry about corrosion. maybe the pro one coated heads are better?
powermizer is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2016 | 12:05 PM
  #19  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

My head guy, really likes trick flows heads. Quality , cost ,performance.

My little 468ci engines with 420 B&M blowers, have crower 236/245 114 LSA hyd roller cams. Installed on a 110icl, the intake valve closes at 48*. This past winter, i retarded the cams 4*. Intake valve obviously now closing later.

The static comp is 8:1. The cylinder heads, measured out at 330cc after some throat cut and blend. Twin 850 carbs.

Textbook says these engines should be turds down low.

At loto, night time speed limit is 30mph. I had no issues running on plane at 2700-2800rpm. When cruising along at 3500rpm. And if the drives are nuetral trim or higher, and i stab the throttles, i blow the 17" cleaver props out, and hit the rev limiter.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 12-21-2016 | 12:12 PM
  #20  
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
My head guy, really likes trick flows heads. Quality , cost ,performance.

My little 468ci engines with 420 B&M blowers, have crower 236/245 114 LSA hyd roller cams. Installed on a 110icl, the intake valve closes at 48*. This past winter, i retarded the cams 4*. Intake valve obviously now closing later.

The static comp is 8:1. The cylinder heads, measured out at 330cc after some throat cut and blend. Twin 850 carbs.

Textbook says these engines should be turds down low.

At loto, night time speed limit is 30mph. I had no issues running on plane at 2700-2800rpm. When cruising along at 3500rpm. And if the drives are nuetral trim or higher, and i stab the throttles, i blow the 17" cleaver props out, and hit the rev limiter.
What do you limit your RPM up top?
powermizer is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.