![]() |
Originally Posted by powermizer
(Post 4512124)
That 420 blower must have low parasitic loss.
They can be converted to a three helix rotor also and are said to be about 20% more efficient. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by powermizer
(Post 4512124)
That 420 blower must have low parasitic loss.
heres some parasitic numbers from a 6-71 |
Originally Posted by Black Baja
(Post 4511622)
Who at Comp gave you this recommendation?
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4511907)
Here's a 548ci, with AFR 325 heads, with around 8.5lbs of boost. 420 Mega Blower, with chiller. Hyd roller, I do not recall the cam specs.
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4512133)
That's a good one....
They can be converted to a three helix rotor also and are said to be about 20% more efficient. I think the 420 is a good blower, but I don't know if I would invest the money to do a bunch of mods to it, aside from a good rebuild, fresh strips, etc. The couplers and main shaft are the weak link . Blower shop does offer a Billet front cover, and option to run their snout on them, as well as replacement shaft and coupler. For a low boost boat application, they work pretty good. I don't think that be the blower I want for a blown alcohol setup though, with high overdrive/boost, and lots of stress on the stock snout, etc. The one thing I like about the straight 2 lobe rotors, is the fuel distribution is good. You really don't get the big variance from front to rear cylinders with fuel distribution, or bank to bank, like you do with a twisted rotor that pushes the charge to one end. |
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4512146)
I've gotta stop looking at these SC build numbers and you know why!!! Wtf.... dish Pistons one week and dome the next. Fken ah.
|
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4512148)
Im not sure I buy that. B&M did some extensive testing on a 2 lobe, vs 3 lobe GMC 671 blower, when developing the 420 Megablower. There just wasnt much difference. The concept behind the two lobe rotor, is that the rotors take up less space inside the case, which allow for more air to be available per revolution.
I think the 420 is a good blower, but I don't know if I would invest the money to do a bunch of mods to it, aside from a good rebuild, fresh strips, etc. The couplers and main shaft are the weak link . Blower shop does offer a Billet front cover, and option to run their snout on them, as well as replacement shaft and coupler. For a low boost boat application, they work pretty good. I don't think that be the blower I want for a blown alcohol setup though, with high overdrive/boost, and lots of stress on the stock snout, etc. The one thing I like about the straight 2 lobe rotors, is the fuel distribution is good. You really don't get the big variance from front to rear cylinders with fuel distribution, or bank to bank, like you do with a twisted rotor that pushes the charge to one end. |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4512149)
Mild Valvetrain that lives long time, with some boost, is hard to beat. Mercury marine knows this
|
I just need to know the thoughts on what RPM do we want to run the engine at after seeing what a dyno shows. Are we looking for peak HP or peak torque or somewhere in between. I had always thought running at peak torque was stressful on the engine. Please give me your thoughts. Thanks!
|
Originally Posted by powermizer
(Post 4512396)
I just need to know the thoughts on what RPM do we want to run the engine at after seeing what a dyno shows. Are we looking for peak HP or peak torque or somewhere in between. I had always thought running at peak torque was stressful on the engine. Please give me your thoughts. Thanks!
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:01 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.