Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Some Saturday Motor Fun >

Some Saturday Motor Fun

Notices

Some Saturday Motor Fun

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-17-2017 | 12:31 PM
  #41  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
I think she's gonna make more TQ than HP.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 12:33 PM
  #42  
Thread Starter
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 312
Likes: 22
From: Reno, NV
Default

That is what I thought too 670 lbs of torque at 3700 is not to shabby. I know how this works in a car but how does this torque work down low with an outdrive? Will this benefit in getting the boat up on plane quick?
Tahoe540 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 06:27 PM
  #43  
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,189
Likes: 55
From: Cape coral, FL
Default

Boat motor or tractor tailer? Lol
Crude Intentions is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 06:41 PM
  #44  
Thread Starter
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 312
Likes: 22
From: Reno, NV
Default

I just picked it up and they used 1 3/4 primary tube headers on this so the exhaust was crap. He also told me to go down one jet size all the way around.
Tahoe540 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 06:48 PM
  #45  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

I've seen some AFR headed 540 combos here on oso, that didn't make that kind of low end torque , with smaller CC heads, and smaller cams.

Are those heads using the stock 2.19 intake valves?
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 06:54 PM
  #46  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by Tahoe540
That is what I thought too 670 lbs of torque at 3700 is not to shabby. I know how this works in a car but how does this torque work down low with an outdrive? Will this benefit in getting the boat up on plane quick?
Certainly. It should be a nice combo for a 30ft single engine boat. Some larger headers would have helped , esp in the upper rpm band. 1.75 is small for that build.

I think your cam guy did a good job. I'm sure most were thinking, that cam was way too big, and not enough split, but I think it could have used a bit more cam. Hence why I said it will make more TQ, than HP.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 07:10 PM
  #47  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,961
Likes: 6,444
From: Chicago
Default

This should be Getherdones favorite build. But he`d use a smaller cam for even more TQ .

ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 07:28 PM
  #48  
Thread Starter
Registered
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 312
Likes: 22
From: Reno, NV
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Are those heads using the stock 2.19 intake valves?
They are 2.25 now. The cam was reground by this guy my machinist uses in socal. He has reground one of my solid drag race cams but I have not used it yet as the clay smith I had custom ground works so much better than the Erson I had in there. Good people over at Clay Smith.

I know everyone talks about HP numbers breaking outdrives but what does high torque down low do to them. I will state I am not planning on hole shots and abuse on the outdrive. I have already bought a spare one just in case.
Tahoe540 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 07:52 PM
  #49  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Tahoe540
Well just got the numbers and am very happy with the outcome. 621 peak HP and 670 peak torque.
Well I was within 1 hp but off with rpm. I woulda though even advanced 2 deg it woulda peaked out higher. Nice build
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 08:05 PM
  #50  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
This should be Getherdones favorite build. But he`d use a smaller cam for even more TQ .

Hey now....

It is kinda funny though when your think of a tunnel ram 565 with 236/244 much smaller than 252/252 yet pulls peak hp at 6k. Port velocity??? Valve timing??? Wonder what OP's peak hp woulda been with some 315/325 worked over heads with 2.30 valves.

Btw I did end up with cams that even make yours look small. Lol

Last edited by getrdunn; 02-17-2017 at 08:08 PM.
getrdunn is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.