Stainless marine to stellings width issues?
#11
9.8 vs 10.2 deck makes a difference, couldn't remember what you bought, I guess if you didn't need to modify your existing exhaust you will be ok
Last edited by F-2 Speedy; 02-02-2017 at 07:53 AM.
#13
Not sure which generation stainless marine you have , but I can tell you that you will be going backwards replacing stainless marine with stellings headers..in terms of maintenance . You will be testing and fixing those headers every year, been there done that...never again... I will tell you that I had stellings black model and they fit a tighter center than my new stainless marine gen 3 ... Jerry had to make custom center manifolds to make mine fit.
#15
Registered

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
For me, its a no brainer to use GEN III stainless marine on a blower motor. Performance and reliability.
N/A motor, there could be some decent perf gains with a full length header over a gil or sm marine standard setup.
My stellings were made in 1996. I had them repaired once in 2011 for a slight leak. But I dont run in salt either.
N/A motor, there could be some decent perf gains with a full length header over a gil or sm marine standard setup.
My stellings were made in 1996. I had them repaired once in 2011 for a slight leak. But I dont run in salt either.
#19
For overall (peak) power the full header will be the best bet. But thru the cruise RPM range you won't see a big gain over the Stainless marine. The Stainless Marine sure are more reliable than ay full length header out there other than the Keith Eikert stuff.
#20
Registered

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
I've got the stallings green tag in a 12 meter with 33 1/2" center and have a good 1 1/4 btwn the two center. The only thing to consider is that's with gm heads. Your aftermarket heads with 1/2" raised exhaust ports will narrow the gap a bit.
Last edited by getrdunn; 02-02-2017 at 11:40 AM.





