Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Procharger performance >

Procharger performance

Notices

Procharger performance

Old 07-20-2017 | 11:20 AM
  #31  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Originally Posted by indysupra
It's port injected. No I don't see any spikes. New pulleys just arrived so I will see after that but doubtful. In a car I know it can be an issue when the boost gets higher. I know 100 deg is obtainable with other setups i was just posting it because of where I'm getting my water from ( almost engine temp water). With some testing I did with doing one motor directly from the sea strainer and the other thru the crossover it was 18 degrees cooler but was in different operating conditions. I have the fitting to change it over but don't want to change too many things at once. Also another note on iat's i know of many setups that are in excess of 130. And that in a boat is to the point of needing timing pulled.
Thats pretty good IAT without any fuel cooling in the plenum
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 07-20-2017 | 05:54 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 3
From: indianapolis
Default

I'm thinking I'll be able to keep them at 90 deg ish when plumed to cooler water. Another good thing is the intercoolers are pretty cheap. I got both of mine for about half of one roots style intercoolers.
indysupra is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-2017 | 11:39 AM
  #33  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by articfriends
The flow curve starts out slower the bigger a procharger is, my m3sc made 900 or 950 ft lbs tq at 3500 and 890 or something like that at 3000 but it was pulleyed waaay up, i DRAG raced roots blown flat bottom vdrives from a 40mph roll from 3500 up and surprised quite a few of them with my 272 baja, fwiw, smitty
I find it a great shame that you just couldn't get that extra .5mph to hit the century mark on that baby, lol.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-2017 | 12:42 PM
  #34  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
I find it a great shame that you just couldn't get that extra .5mph to hit the century mark on that baby, lol.
after violently bow steering bow sideways at 96 mph when testing the imco -2 and hanging onto steering wheel with legs in air it put the fear in me, sold shorty which never worked well and ran the 1050hp pulley w 30 pitch 98% of time after that around 96 mph, lost interest in breaking that century mark!
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-2017 | 12:48 PM
  #35  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
I find it a great shame that you just couldn't get that extra .5mph to hit the century mark on that baby, lol.
water tuned a whippled 500efi last monday for a oso member from indiana in a baja 232 , boat still had cable steering! Brought back memorys of the pre hyd steering days w my 272 back when it ran in the 70's
That little 232 was a REAL handful, ran mid 80s when we were done, told owner his next purchase should be twin ram full hys steering. Friend who bought the 272 had us put a m-3sc back on it yesterday but its on a iron headed 560hp 502 not the 548 i had. Going out to water tune that today or tommorrow, will probably run 78ish, with the big trim tabs and hyd steeringb i left on boat when i sold it that will be like a gentle cruising speed!
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-2017 | 01:43 PM
  #36  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Bajas have their place in the world, it's not at the century mark. Kuddos for trying though! I actually took your experience into consideration in what to do, or not do on my 272.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply
Old 07-21-2017 | 04:10 PM
  #37  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,037
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

W 24"trum tabs, nose cone and full twin ram hyd steering boat was fairly solid to mid 90s, you wouldnt run those speeds in 3 footers or bad criss cross wakes by any means. I did race that 35 or 36 ft baja in pt huron that has lingenfelter 604's thru 2-3 foot criss cross waves for 8 or 10 miles a little hairy!!
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-2017 | 09:13 PM
  #38  
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 3
From: indianapolis
Default

Not my final version but I made these up real quick to see how big of a difference it would make. Holy crap! Huge difference. So much easier on the boat.
Attached Thumbnails Procharger performance-img_0318.jpg  
indysupra is offline  
Reply
Old 09-16-2017 | 09:23 PM
  #39  
Thread Starter
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,332
Likes: 73
From: chicago
Default

Mike tkach and I were talking about those for procharged setups
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Reply
Old 09-17-2017 | 10:43 AM
  #40  
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 9,969
Likes: 6,460
From: Chicago
Default

Originally Posted by indysupra
Not my final version but I made these up real quick to see how big of a difference it would make. Holy crap! Huge difference. So much easier on the boat.
How did those help? Please tell us more.
ICDEDPPL is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.