Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Noisy lifter >

Noisy lifter

Notices

Noisy lifter

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-11-2017, 08:55 PM
  #11  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,693
Received 1,204 Likes on 577 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
What about a Topline High Lift Johnson ?
If it's a Johnson, it's the one that has the American flag on the box. I'm not bashing the quality of the component, just sharing the findings. I work in manufacturing and know s#it happens once in a while. One engine was relatively quiet and the other one had a couple noisy lifters. It's just the $1800 in lifters and the labor. It could have been worse if not caught. See above, that sucks endeavor1
Rookie is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 09:13 PM
  #12  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,538
Received 3,108 Likes on 1,401 Posts
Default





SB is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 10:04 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 4,636
Received 790 Likes on 372 Posts
Default

How old are the lifters...first I've seen or heard a Johnson failure. Surprised but I'm sure it happens. Good luck!!
1MOSES1 is offline  
Old 06-11-2017, 10:13 PM
  #14  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,693
Received 1,204 Likes on 577 Posts
Default

They were 2 summers old when replaced last year. (Michigan)
Just took apart this week.
Rookie is offline  
Old 06-12-2017, 08:05 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Buy a lottery ticket !!!!
ezstriper is offline  
Old 06-12-2017, 10:15 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cudjoe Key FL
Posts: 854
Received 105 Likes on 51 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Rookie
Huh?

I'll have to check brand. I believe it's short travel high RPM lifter. Put some solids in and lashed to 0.007" problem solved. And they're quiet.
So, educate me please. It is ok to replace a hydraulic roller lifter with a solid roller lifter w/o changing the cam? I thought about doing this but was unclear if it was acceptable. Thanks
sonicss42 is offline  
Old 06-12-2017, 10:59 AM
  #17  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sonicss42
So, educate me please. It is ok to replace a hydraulic roller lifter with a solid roller lifter w/o changing the cam? I thought about doing this but was unclear if it was acceptable. Thanks
I was always under the understanding, that a solid roller camshaft, has lash ramps built into the cam lobes. One cam grinder i spoke to a while back, advised against running solids on a hydraulic cam lobe, as it could be hard on things.

A buddy of mine had some 509s that had that setup, and the valvetrain suffered some parts failures after not alot of hours . I do know some guys run that setup and have good luck.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 06-12-2017, 11:06 AM
  #18  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Quote from Mike Jones of Jones cams.

Assuming the cam has a .006" "hydr" ramp(it could be a .004" ramp), to reliably run mechanical roller lifters on it, you would need the Hot lash to be below .0108"(.006"x1.8 ). With an aluminum block and heads, I would bet you're getting more then .012" growth from cold to hot, so even if you set the cold lash at .0000", you would be off the ramp when the engine was hot. That will put the valve acceleration, on and off the seat, way too high, and shorten the life of your valvetrain.
If your cam is one of Comp's more aggressive cams, with only a .004" ramp, or one of their profiles with no ramp on the opening side, the acceleration would be even higher.

Bottom Line: If you want to run mechanical roller lifters, run a cam that's designed for mechanical roller lifters. If you think you've got a better idea, then the guys that are designing the cams, you don't
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 06-12-2017, 11:21 AM
  #19  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

That being said. OBVIOUSLY following the rules didnt work out for rookie. Question is, was it a fluke, a lifter issue, or a cam issue.

I know a certain persons cams, had a good track record of breaking all kinds of stuff. Lifters, rockers, valve seats, and so on
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 06-12-2017, 12:06 PM
  #20  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Rookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,693
Received 1,204 Likes on 577 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
That being said. OBVIOUSLY following the rules didnt work out for rookie. Question is, was it a fluke, a lifter issue, or a cam issue.

I know a certain persons cams, had a good track record of breaking all kinds of stuff. Lifters, rockers, valve seats, and so on
Just to clarify this is not my setup and not said certain person's cams. Mild 230/240 something Comp cam low 0.600" lift RV cams lol
Rookie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.