Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Victor Jr Intakes >

Victor Jr Intakes

Notices

Victor Jr Intakes

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-16-2018, 05:16 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 178
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Which intake part number for rectangle ports you recommend? I find a couple different ones in air gap dual plane
dwtinc is offline  
Old 11-18-2018, 02:25 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Harrington DE
Posts: 32
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought 2 hp500 “copy” intakes from a distributor and got 2 pro comp intakes. 10 years ago.
Hot Rod 29 is offline  
Old 11-21-2018, 04:51 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm wondering if you would see the same losses with the Victor Jr oval single plane on a oval port head, 100% not arguing the facts with the performer RPM/air gap manifolds. Just curious if it would fall somewhere in the middle between the two.
Camalot is offline  
Old 11-21-2018, 11:55 PM
  #14  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 143 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Camalot
I'm wondering if you would see the same losses with the Victor Jr oval single plane on a oval port head, 100% not arguing the facts with the performer RPM/air gap manifolds. Just curious if it would fall somewhere in the middle between the two.
This article is all Edelbrock top end, but they are using Oval ports. The relevant part is at the end where they put a single plane weiand similar to the VicJR and the results were the same as stated in this thread. The VicJR is a good manifold, it’s more that the airgap filled a little niche between a truck manifold and real big power.

Get More Power from a Chevrolet Performance ZZ502 Crate Engine
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 11-23-2018, 11:38 AM
  #15  
BUP
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lucky cat

Smitty..I know a couple people that run the Professional Products Hurricane intake ( Dart copy I believe) do you have any experience with those?
cheap and internal poor casting from the ones I seen. This is were price shows its quality
BUP is offline  
Old 11-23-2018, 11:52 AM
  #16  
BUP
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ft. Worth TX
Posts: 9,594
Likes: 0
Received 41 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

if you are not running high RPMs never understood why run one of the Victors. the range states 3500 to 7500. Heck not many boats even running 6500 rpms more of less 7500 rpms. I would use the dual plane air gap and play with spacers especially wood or phenolic. Also port match at the very least. . Info on the Victors and rpms.

https://www.jegs.com/p/Edelbrock/Ede...79363/10002/-1
BUP is offline  
Old 11-23-2018, 02:59 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster


This article is all Edelbrock top end, but they are using Oval ports. The relevant part is at the end where they put a single plane weiand similar to the VicJR and the results were the same as stated in this thread. The VicJR is a good manifold, it’s more that the airgap filled a little niche between a truck manifold and real big power.

Get More Power from a Chevrolet Performance ZZ502 Crate Engine
Thanks for the link interesting stuff for sure all though the test was kinda floored, if they had used the same size carb it would have been a better back to back test so we will never really know,
Camalot is offline  
Old 11-23-2018, 03:03 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BUP
if you are not running high RPMs never understood why run one of the Victors. the range states 3500 to 7500. Heck not many boats even running 6500 rpms more of less 7500 rpms. I would use the dual plane air gap and play with spacers especially wood or phenolic. Also port match at the very least. . Info on the Victors and rpms.

https://www.jegs.com/p/Edelbrock/Ede...79363/10002/-1
They are just advertised RPM ranges for the auto world, a dyno could never replicate the dynamic state of a boat under load!
Camalot is offline  
Old 11-24-2018, 08:08 AM
  #19  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Camalot
They are just advertised RPM ranges for the auto world, a dyno could never replicate the dynamic state of a boat under load!
i think a modern engine dyno can simulate those load scenerios, however, finding a shop that is willing to do that, is far and few. Theres just no way a sweep from 3500-6000 is going to give you a proper tune/test. You can bring the engine up to say 3500rpm, and load the brake to where you get a real world intake manifold pressure reading, to simulate the cruising load.

for example. If my boat cruises at 3500, making 1psi of boost, I can replicate that on the dyno. At that point, you can adjust for best ignition timing, fuel mixture, record data, etc. Imo, there is no better way to find out a proper ignition curve, than watching and letting the engine tell you what it likes for ignition timing. This is pretty much how the manufactures do things. They certainly arent building a 700sci merc, or hellcat hemi, and just doing a 10 second sweep pull on the dyno and calling it a day.

its kinda amazing, because theres guys who build some pretty high end engines in our hobby. Spending well north of 50,000 dollars on a custom engine package. Using the best parts, sparing no expense. Yet, the final product, and its validity, is determined by a few simple wot pulls on a dyno.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 12-01-2018, 07:57 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Salisbury N.C.
Posts: 487
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
i think a modern engine dyno can simulate those load scenerios, however, finding a shop that is willing to do that, is far and few. Theres just no way a sweep from 3500-6000 is going to give you a proper tune/test. You can bring the engine up to say 3500rpm, and load the brake to where you get a real world intake manifold pressure reading, to simulate the cruising load.

for example. If my boat cruises at 3500, making 1psi of boost, I can replicate that on the dyno. At that point, you can adjust for best ignition timing, fuel mixture, record data, etc. Imo, there is no better way to find out a proper ignition curve, than watching and letting the engine tell you what it likes for ignition timing. This is pretty much how the manufactures do things. They certainly arent building a 700sci merc, or hellcat hemi, and just doing a 10 second sweep pull on the dyno and calling it a day.

its kinda amazing, because theres guys who build some pretty high end engines in our hobby. Spending well north of 50,000 dollars on a custom engine package. Using the best parts, sparing no expense. Yet, the final product, and its validity, is determined by a few simple wot pulls on a dyno.
I agree completely , most engine shops have older , small capacity dynos ( 901-stuska 600 -froude ) that are rated at 1000hp or less . Those old girls are good up to a point but , they cant do steady state with that kind of torque. The steady state testing requires an ass load of constant cold water supply , like directly from city water mains! Or a huge underground tank and return water chiller. ( the napcar shop i worked at had 5000 gallons underground , 10000 above ground and 2 , 1000 gallon a minute chillers with city water make up , to keep dyno brake water temp below 140. For full race duration simulations ) . Most shops cant justify that level of cost . Thus the few quick pulls and done. Depending on the build , it may take as many as 20-30 pulls to normalize and get repeatability, and thats back to back with no idle time!
dunnitagain is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.