![]() |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4681629)
Verified cam timing. Survey says it is within .5 degrees of centerline. Out she comes. I have decided since I am going to be forced to add split thus adding overlap that I am going to step this **** up a notch. I know it will have to be dry exhaust at this point so screw it. Will give specs within the hour |
Originally Posted by hogie roll
(Post 4681770)
They were very high end 750hp LS7 builds. At least 427s, maybe bigger I don’t recall. A skater in Michigan had them. |
Cams ordered. 237/252 113+3 .637/.621 lift. Should be a fun comparison. Could have went with much more radical setup but this should take the cake while still working well with future modifications |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4682455)
Cams ordered. 237/252 113+3 .637/.621 lift. Should be a fun comparison. Could have went with much more radical setup but this should take the cake while still working well with future modifications Thanks |
Originally Posted by Rookie
(Post 4682508)
That's a big swing. Will be great to see the difference.
Thanks |
Round 2. Fight https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...be4c43c07.jpeg |
Nice, when is the next dyno date?
|
Talked to dyno guy yesterday and he is saying by the end of next week. Already installed and ready to make noise. |
Same heads? |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4683949)
Same heads? |
Hi ho hi ho. Back to dyno we go. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...342acc9d1.jpeg |
Hope all works out well. Make that boy grunt. |
Inquiring minds want to know.....lol!
|
Originally Posted by TracyRR
(Post 4684202)
Inquiring minds want to know.....lol!
|
Just confirmed. Dyno tomorrow. |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4684780)
Just confirmed. Dyno tomorrow. |
Post them up when you get them! |
Will do. Will be a fun test. The cam should be spot on for the application. Valve shrouding should be the only hindering factor at this point. I will be very surprised to not see at least 600. Lets see how greedy this dyno is. Results will tell the tale. Mostly interested in bsfc numbers to tell the truth |
Valve shrouding 101. Hit my peak dead on the head. Ended up making more power with proform 850 than pro systems 1050. And ran wayyyy better https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...c194e0241.jpeg |
Looks like the new cam didnt give anything up anywhere from 3000 and up
|
Who needs torque anyway. Lol What’s the specs again? High compression too right? Looks like it still can’t touch a mild big block. This is good info. Been following along |
Good numbers! Time for me to invest in an LQ4
|
Original cam vs new cam. Both runs with single planehttps://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...04986f267.jpeg |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4684968)
Valve shrouding 101. Hit my peak dead on the head. Ended up making more power with proform 850 than pro systems 1050. And ran wayyyy better |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4684984)
You have data from the run(s) with the Proform ?
|
looks like my 550 hp guess was very close.you did loose some weight from the bilge.
|
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4684991)
looks like my 550 hp guess was very close.you did loose some weight from the bilge.
|
Originally Posted by Crude Intentions
(Post 4684973)
Who needs torque anyway. Lol What’s the specs again? High compression too right? Looks like it still can’t touch a mild big block. This is good info. Been following along |
|
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4684997)
High compression? 11:1 vs stock ls3 10.8. Nope. Mild compression 91 octane gas sippers. Didnt meet my mark. Thats on me. But torque where I need it, not where it breaks drives. Hell I can rev it to 7k safely if I dare lol. That beIng said, prob not where id want to be with a carburetor setup and basic ignition setup. I don't think 11:1 compression is "mild" by any means, for a pump gas boat engine. Id say its a bit closer to borderline , and a bad tank of gas away from knocking itself to death. LS or not, detonation doesnt care what you name the engine. Id keep a close on that tune . What kind of egts were you seeing from cyl to cyl? |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4685000)
One thing about the stock, car engines, is they have an engine management system. My 6.4L hemi is 10.9:1 stock. It also is very sensitive to octane, air temperature, fuel mixture etc. Could see some short term knock retard just from going from one gas stations 93 to another brand. It runs great, thanks to a modern engine management system that as many failsafes working nonstop to prevent detonation. Basically, they run it on the edge from the factory , and "tuning" doesnt do a whole lot for them. The engines run near peak performance thanks to all those sensors.
That beIng said, prob not where id want to be with a carburetor setup and basic ignition setup. I don't think 11:1 compression is "mild" by any means, for a pump gas boat engine. Id say its a bit closer to borderline , and a bad tank of gas away from knocking itself to death. LS or not, detonation doesnt care what you name the engine. Id keep a close on that tune . What kind of egts were you seeing from cyl to cyl? |
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
(Post 4685000)
One thing about the stock, car engines, is they have an engine management system. My 6.4L hemi is 10.9:1 stock. It also is very sensitive to octane, air temperature, fuel mixture etc. Could see some short term knock retard just from going from one gas stations 93 to another brand. It runs great, thanks to a modern engine management system that as many failsafes working nonstop to prevent detonation. Basically, they run it on the edge from the factory , and "tuning" doesnt do a whole lot for them. The engines run near peak performance thanks to all those sensors.
That beIng said, prob not where id want to be with a carburetor setup and basic ignition setup. I don't think 11:1 compression is "mild" by any means, for a pump gas boat engine. Id say its a bit closer to borderline , and a bad tank of gas away from knocking itself to death. LS or not, detonation doesnt care what you name the engine. Id keep a close on that tune . What kind of egts were you seeing from cyl to cyl? |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4684995)
Good guess. I would say that I am pretty much at the limit of stock ls3 heads on a 4.030 bore as far as hp goes, maybe a few more if I wasnt running marine application. Valve shrouding is hurting me so the only thing left to do is porting. I am done playing around with them for the summer and am going boating. At the end of the season, mid november lol, gotta love Arizona, I will be doing cnc heads and roller rockers. Results will be posted again. |
Originally Posted by mike tkach
(Post 4685004)
just for the hell of it,go to post#4.
|
Here is a 468 blower motor on the same dyno just for comparison sake. You can decide if it is greedy or not. I believe he said this was 731 cam https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...573c66deb.jpeg |
Maybe they’ll be faster than 525s |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4685119)
Here is a 468 blower motor on the same dyno just for comparison sake. You can decide if it is greedy or not. I believe he said this was 731 cam |
Originally Posted by mggdoors
(Post 4685119)
Here is a 468 blower motor on the same dyno just for comparison sake. You can decide if it is greedy or not. I believe he said this was 731 cam https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...573c66deb.jpeg |
Originally Posted by hogie roll
(Post 4685124)
Maybe they’ll be faster than 525s |
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4685125)
Show the part of your sheets that shows fuel flow and I will answer this for you.
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...2ac642fd5f.jpg |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:34 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.