Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Anyone ever try the BBC trick flow intake manifold? 540-565 ci >

Anyone ever try the BBC trick flow intake manifold? 540-565 ci

Notices

Anyone ever try the BBC trick flow intake manifold? 540-565 ci

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-18-2019 | 07:54 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 402
From: Cheboygan, MI
Default

Good point on the carb spacers. I added a Phenolic 1" tapered spacer and it made a noticeable improvement, especially on the low to mid range acceleration . I then added a 1" open spacer under that and noticed even more improvement.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Reply
Old 04-18-2019 | 03:26 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Registered
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 8,356
Likes: 1,515
From: NW Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by ThisIsLivin
Good point on the carb spacers. I added a Phenolic 1" tapered spacer and it made a noticeable improvement, especially on the low to mid range acceleration . I then added a 1" open spacer under that and noticed even more improvement.
That seems to be the ticket for many NA bui,SS from what I understand.
Tks
getrdunn is offline  
Reply
Old 04-20-2019 | 03:42 PM
  #13  
bck's Avatar
bck
Charter Member#568
25 Year Member
Charter Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,171
Likes: 17
From: Western N.Y.
Default

Originally Posted by ThisIsLivin
Good point on the carb spacers. I added a Phenolic 1" tapered spacer and it made a noticeable improvement, especially on the low to mid range acceleration . I then added a 1" open spacer under that and noticed even more improvement.
When I tested my 540s with different cams, intakes and carbs there was always an improvement with spacers. 1in was better than none and 2in was better than 1in. The only caveat to that was that with the last combo even though the 2in added about 5-6 hp at peak the 1in had a broader area under the curve so I stuck with the 1in.
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks

Last edited by bck; 04-20-2019 at 03:49 PM.
bck is offline  
Reply
Old 04-21-2019 | 09:01 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 402
From: Cheboygan, MI
Default

Try the combination of a tapered and open. I noticed the improvement right from plane to top end. I didn’t dyno it, but to notice a marked improvement had to be more than 5 or 6hp.
ThisIsLivin is offline  
Reply
Old 04-22-2019 | 09:31 AM
  #15  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,032
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

Haven't seen that intake in person. I just dynoed a 565 w profiler intake, it came within 15 hp of what dyno sim showed ( 865hp), I just dynoed a 555, had flotek 375 heads, claimed flow about identical to the profiler heads, calculated hp also in the 880 to 900 range, was off the mark by 100 hp, had a BMP 4500 intake box stock. Customer had no interest in trying spacers because he had no room in his car vs hood scoop anyways but compared to most other similar motors I have dynoed I can about guarantee there was 20 hp to be had from spacers and box stock bmp/merlix x ports vs cncd 375 heads at 1.625 vs 1.82 and 2.375 vs 2.54 , Im going to assume hp was lost there but customer had sent intake out for nitrous plumbing and wasnt taking it back off to try a different one or mod it
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 04-22-2019 | 09:44 AM
  #16  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,032
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

I would have liked to compared my chinesium intake that i outperformed a edelbrock super victor with to this merlin/ bmp. I dont think when you have heads that flow 300/320 cfm and motors turning 5800 that there is a ton of difference between most open.plenums as long as you give it as much spacer as it needs to straighten out air flow, add plenum.volume. now, bump ci up to 565, turn rpms up to 6500, buy heads that are supposed to flow 440 cfm, then any intake thats not perfectly matched to the killer heads is going to hurt combo/hp by knocking that flow waaaay down
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 04-22-2019 | 09:50 AM
  #17  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 786
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Originally Posted by articfriends
Haven't seen that intake in person. I just dynoed a 565 w profiler intake, it came within 15 hp of what dyno sim showed ( 865hp), I just dynoed a 555, had flotek 375 heads, claimed flow about identical to the profiler heads, calculated hp also in the 880 to 900 range, was off the mark by 100 hp, had a BMP 4500 intake box stock. Customer had no interest in trying spacers because he had no room in his car vs hood scoop anyways but compared to most other similar motors I have dynoed I can about guarantee there was 20 hp to be had from spacers and box stock bmp/merlix x ports vs cncd 375 heads at 1.625 vs 1.82 and 2.375 vs 2.54 , Im going to assume hp was lost there but customer had sent intake out for nitrous plumbing and wasnt taking it back off to try a different one or mod it
First combo was profiler head and intake? The profiler and some edelbrocks seem to be the yellowbullet favorites.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2019 | 06:50 AM
  #18  
articfriends's Avatar
Platinum Member
20 Year Member
Platinum Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,317
Likes: 1,032
From: frankenmuth michigan
Default

Originally Posted by hogie roll


First combo was profiler head and intake? The profiler and some edelbrocks seem to be the yellowbullet favorites.
Yes, 565 w profiler 375 heads. profiler intake, 1250 dom modded by norm to flow 1400+ , was close to what dyno sim showed at 865hp (compression though was not ideal at only 12.8 because it was originally built to spray with nitrous)
555 w flotek 375s, merlin x intake box stock except a bunch of nitrous lines plumbed on manifold and slight port obstruction from nitrous tips, box stock 1250 dom, also had only 12.5 complression becuase again was built to be sprayed, it actually calculated on dyno sim at about 900 hp, missed its mark by a mile at only 780. afrs were in the mid 11s, if you leaned it out intio the low 12s it made 760 hp, bsfcs were terrible for compression motor at .460 to .540 on top, the 565 had bsfscs in low to mid .400s, .380s even in some spots, it made all kinds of power leaning it into the high 12's while tuning.
customer was unwilling to try a different intake or even carb spacers on 555 so in the end did the box stock merlin kill power, did the flotek heads not flow what they were claimed, just more questions.
In our MARINE world, a 540/565 with pretty much any open plenum intake, especially one with a dominator where throttle bores are spread out versus tight in midddle wants a intake with some plenum volume and transition from flange to port openings if its not built into the intake already, hence carb spacers picking up both tq and hp without much negative effects IF you have hatch clearance, Smitty
articfriends is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2019 | 11:02 AM
  #19  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 786
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
Default

Interesting. Profiler seems to be one of the companies that makes the HP and runs the numbers on track. The single 4 and tunnel ram are everyone’s favorites. And that 370 head really starts flowing at 0.700 lift.

I don’t recall seeing a test where plenum volume has ever hurt. I suspect the trade off may only be in throttle response.
hogie roll is offline  
Reply
Old 04-24-2019 | 11:26 AM
  #20  
Registered
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
Default

With all of these spacers it seems like we're just getting back to the venerable tunnel ram.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.