Anyone ever try the BBC trick flow intake manifold? 540-565 ci
#21
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 3,667
From: On A Dirt Floor
Just like adding spacers to a dual plane is not making a single plane.
Making something share 1 characteristic does make something become another.
#22
Registered

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 404
From: Collierville, TN and Pickwick Lake
https://rehermorrison.com/product/an...ersion-plates/
These made an extra 8-12 horsepower on my 540s.
These made an extra 8-12 horsepower on my 540s.
#23
Most these bigger motors if you add a tunnel ram to dyno sim it shows signifigant gains with virtually no torque loss. I have never built a motor with a tunnel ram or dynoed one with one but i plan to!
#27
Registered

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 404
From: Collierville, TN and Pickwick Lake

Richie Zul did quite a few of them so I'm thinking they work pretty well.
Last edited by payuppsucker; 04-25-2019 at 09:17 AM.
#28
Registered

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 786
From: St. Pete Beach, FL
That depends on runner Csa and length. Sized properly they will always be better due to the straighter line to the valve.
#29
Registered

Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 14,068
Likes: 3,667
From: On A Dirt Floor

Lastly, a certain tunnel ram isn't the same as the net. Runner cross sectional area and length and plenum volume all determine what rpm vs cid vs power it ill make. Same with single pane intakes...thus why it drive's me nuts (single plane intake manifolds mostly) when talked about generically.
Another thing is, people back then didn't really realize the different timing requirements of the tunnel rams. They typically love a ton of initial timing.
#30
Registered

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,888
Likes: 148
From: SF Bay Area
I think given the advancements of engine building the tunnel ram may be a good option again.




