496 Mag: Temp Sensor vs Temp Sender
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
496 Mag: Temp Sensor vs Temp Sender
Relative to 496 Mag
1. What are the specifics regarding the Temperature SENSOR (#7) 805218T versus the Temperature SENDER (#8) 806490T?
2. Electrically, where does each connect, and what is the difference in information they provide?
1. What are the specifics regarding the Temperature SENSOR (#7) 805218T versus the Temperature SENDER (#8) 806490T?
2. Electrically, where does each connect, and what is the difference in information they provide?
#2
Registered
iTrader: (8)
Relative to 496 Mag
1. What are the specifics regarding the Temperature SENSOR (#7) 805218T versus the Temperature SENDER (#8) 806490T?
2. Electrically, where does each connect, and what is the difference in information they provide?
1. What are the specifics regarding the Temperature SENSOR (#7) 805218T versus the Temperature SENDER (#8) 806490T?
2. Electrically, where does each connect, and what is the difference in information they provide?
#3
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MI
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Ryan00TJ.
I believe you are correct since the SENDER is nearest the thermostat and it makes sense to gauge the water temperature at that juncture. I'll check for continuity from that point to the dash gauge to be certain.
I believe you are correct since the SENDER is nearest the thermostat and it makes sense to gauge the water temperature at that juncture. I'll check for continuity from that point to the dash gauge to be certain.
#4
Registered
iTrader: (8)
You want the tan wire going to crossover sender. This is correct sender for your dash gauge water temp. The sensor on other side of crossover is ECT for the PCM555.
Last edited by Ryan00TJ; 12-01-2019 at 06:40 PM.