|
I would think JE must have a shelf labeled specifically for shafiroff loaded with various custom pistons for all the secret combos. Definately fun to navigate their website. I just looked and the two low deck 615/925 pump gas builds. The solid roller 925@6,200 and the hyd roller 925@6,500???
:party-smiley-004: |
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4735646)
Make note I said several not a few. Regardless no dig at Scott or his engines/company at all and know they've been around for many years with very few mostly pity complaints/issues. Does the equation work out to a std 6.135 rod? I didn't do the math but with that bore and stroke just took a stab at it. Nothing in that combo seems right in my head when I see all the potential concerns but NOTHING makes sense to me these days. Lol.
I see there has been more and more of the large CI taking it to a how new level over the last (which is now actually several years). Why not push the limits... Just not that combo for me as all. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...fe6ec74d1e.png |
That’s good to here and know seriously. Makes me kinda jealous actually when I coulda went that route rather than 565’s and picked some worthy power. Already have new rotating assemblies. Went old school 4,600, 4.25, 6.385 combo. That’s what I like about topics on OSO.
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4735887)
That’s good to here and know seriously. Makes me kinda jealous actually when I coulda went that route rather than 565’s and picked some worthy power. Already have new rotating assemblies. Went old school 4,600, 4.25, 6.385 combo. That’s what I like about topics on OSO.
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4735887)
That’s good to here and know seriously. Makes me kinda jealous actually when I coulda went that route rather than 565’s and picked some worthy power. Already have new rotating assemblies. Went old school 4,600, 4.25, 6.385 combo. That’s what I like about topics on OSO.
|
Originally Posted by getrdunn
(Post 4735646)
Make note I said several not a few. Regardless no dig at Scott or his engines/company at all and know they've been around for many years with very few mostly pity complaints/issues. Does the equation work out to a std 6.135 rod? I didn't do the math but with that bore and stroke just took a stab at it. Nothing in that combo seems right in my head when I see all the potential concerns but NOTHING makes sense to me these days. Lol.
I see there has been more and more of the large CI taking it to a how new level over the last (which is now actually several years). Why not push the limits... Just not that combo for me as all. https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...fe6ec74d1e.png SBC guys were running more extreme rod ratios and compression heights than stroked BBCs for years. Only a matter of time before someone decided to try them. I also thought I had a unique idea to help do this, but it turns out piston buttons are already a thing. Nothing new under the sun I tell ya. |
Why would you want a low deck block with that much stroke in a boat ? Not a sarcastic question.
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4735927)
Why would you want a low deck block with that much stroke in a boat ? Not a sarcastic question.
|
Originally Posted by SB
(Post 4735927)
Why would you want a low deck block with that much stroke in a boat ? Not a sarcastic question.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:55 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.