What do the internet experts (like myself) think?

Does shafiroff know something we don’t?

https://www.shafiroff.com/chevy-pump...wg-twisted.php

Sounds nice !

Id like to see how much of the pan rail is left.....lol

according to dart:

• Accepts crankshaft strokes up to 5.000 inch for large displacement applications with clearancing

Would love to do the same just not for an endurance engine you beet the pisssss out hours on end.

I see bore and stroke but not rod length....did I miss it

I'd guess it would have to be a 6.385? What ever combo I'd like to see one tore down after numerous dyno pulls assuming parts aren't scattered throughout. Pistsons side lode etc... yikes but I have no real world experience so I can't honestly say. I grew up with to many old school builders I guess but there still in business after 40 years.

I can assure you parts are not scattered all over the place after a few dyno pulls. This is not a new combo for Shafiroff. Been around several years and makes big horsepower!

rods are probably shorter. At 6.385 the pin would be in the dome

Make note I said several not a few. Regardless no dig at Scott or his engines/company at all and know they've been around for many years with very few mostly pity complaints/issues. Does the equation work out to a std 6.135 rod? I didn't do the math but with that bore and stroke just took a stab at it. Nothing in that combo seems right in my head when I see all the potential concerns but NOTHING makes sense to me these days. Lol.

I see there has been more and more of the large CI taking it to a how new level over the last (which is now actually several years). Why not push the limits... Just not that combo for me as all.