Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Big block vs small block >

Big block vs small block

Notices

Big block vs small block

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-18-2002 | 01:11 PM
  #31  
Ratchet's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
From: Lake St. Clair
Default

Originally posted by jr
Da, You will have plenty of room. I have an 86 26' Nova II. It still sits ass low but not too bad. I have Twin 409's in mine. The old 406's came apart. Right now the boat runs 60 but I have alot of tuning to do. I'm thinking I will be in the low 70's. I've got a picture of the boat at home, I'll post it so you can see how it sits.

Jeff
JR - Depending on how radical your 409's are, you should be able to get into the 70's. My 355's used to run 73-74 in my 85 Nova II. I'll have to admit, it was a handful after about 65 w/ no steering.

Do you have counter rotators ? I didn't, and when it used to come out of the water, the rear of the boat would always skip to one side slightly when you were in the 70 plus range.
Ratchet is offline  
Reply
Old 11-18-2002 | 01:28 PM
  #32  
jr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Rachet, Hydraulic steering is in the plans, eventually. My 409's aren't to radical. I should be getting around 425 HP. I wish I had counter rotation. I'm spinning Alpha SS's. So I have even less in the water but they are alittle stronger than alphas. They will also give alittle more stability side to side because they have a wider profile than an alpha. Once I get them tuned they should scream. They run good, but there is more potential.
 
Reply
Old 11-18-2002 | 03:16 PM
  #33  
Da Patriot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Lake St Clair, MI
Default 70's

I have Bravo's that are counter rotating. And I just purchesed hydrualic stearing. I don't know if the older syle of Nova's are heavier but I am praying that I will push at least 75 mph by GPS. I hope these engines have enough tourqe to turn 26 4 blades. I would hate to throw new engines in for a 3 mph difference.
Da Patriot is offline  
Reply
Old 11-18-2002 | 06:25 PM
  #34  
jr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Here is the boat. And me with a stupid hat.

The boat dry is 5200 lbs, and with 108 gallons, me, and gear, around 6200-6400 lbs.
Attached Thumbnails Big block vs small block-boat150.jpg  
 
Reply
Old 11-19-2002 | 11:04 PM
  #35  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 94
From: oshawa ontario
Default

JR- were you running stock alphas before the SSs??? If so how much of a speed gain did you see with the swap. Im running the stock alphas and my X is VERY conservative, my 3 bladers never ventilate...........Doug
pullmytrigger is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-2002 | 05:22 AM
  #36  
jr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Twinn29, the SS's were on the boat when I bought it so I cant say if I got any gains. But with the SS's which are about 2 inches shorter, I theoretically have a blade tip out of the water from the 10 o'clock to the 2 o'clock position.

Right now I'm spinning 22" Hydromotives. They don't really hook up all that well with my X. I'm running about 15% slip. I can also cavitate all day if I hit the throttles alittle too hard coming out of the hole. Or if I'm trimmed out just alittle. But they do handle well in turns. Next year I'm going to give a couple Mirage Plus 25's a try. I'm hoping the extra cup will help them hook up.

Jeff
 
Reply
Old 11-20-2002 | 08:01 AM
  #37  
Registered
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 94
From: oshawa ontario
Default

Cool JR, I was aware that the SSs were two inches shorter which is alot when talking X dim. Maybe I could find a shop that would let me try a set. hmmmmm. I wouldnt want to go out and buy a set and have them not work at all.
P29 Scarab-If your listening How much shorter are your Imco's and did you get any gains with the swap alone??
pullmytrigger is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-2002 | 01:17 PM
  #38  
KAAMA's Avatar
Registered
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 107
From: Western Michigan
Default

Switching from big blocks to small blocks will require some re-rigging of the boat and you may have more time in it than what you think. I think you'll be alright with the small blocks, but personally, I would have modified those big blocks. It will be interesting to see your results though. Have fun.
KAAMA is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-2002 | 01:30 PM
  #39  
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Cottonwood, California
Default

Cubic inches is horsepower, stick with the big blocks. Put the money into the big blocks that the small blocks and conversion will cost........ultimately will be cheaper and faster
Formulaproject is offline  
Reply
Old 11-20-2002 | 08:48 PM
  #40  
Da Patriot's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Lake St Clair, MI
Default Better Ride

The engine change isn't just for the speed. The boat sits in the water very low in the back. I don't think that twin bb's in a 26' boat make it sit to well in the water that's alot of weight in the back.
Attached Thumbnails Big block vs small block-pat-23.jpg  
Da Patriot is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.