![]() |
Dave may even have a mold on hand for a cig hatch with better clearance if you didn't want to cut up the Cig logo.
|
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4848730)
Second hand experience the fuel distribution on those is terrible, which I don`t understand because it`s port injected..
The runners are super short . |
Originally Posted by Wildman_grafix
(Post 4848839)
Why not just add some small fiber glass scoops or raised section, seems the glass work would be much easier then all the AL fab? Call Glass Dave and tell him he needs a Chi-town ,,,,,, vacation. Or do you not want to change the look of the hatch?
Originally Posted by BBYSTWY
(Post 4848840)
So nobody is asking and I might get told I'm an idiot but I'll ask anyway...being a giant whipple on not much boost in retrospect....do you even need the intercooler? Any idea what you are actually gaining with it and is there a lower profile option out there like TBS intercoolers? I understand that the whipple IC is far superior to TBS however in your application would you really see that much difference? Just a thought??
Originally Posted by speicher lane
(Post 4848841)
Dave may even have a mold on hand for a cig hatch with better clearance if you didn't want to cut up the Cig logo.
Originally Posted by delsol
(Post 4848918)
What have you heard about these manifolds?? I just got my set with double port injection to sit under a set of 3.8l whipples and MOACS...:poopoo:
I can`t swing the moac but I`ll probably end up with that Whipple fuel injected intake and reuse my intercoolers, if the tunnel rams sell . |
I`m also not crazy about how much weight there is top of the intake and how high above the intake it is.
To me it`s asking a lot from the intake bolts. sometimes I try to do cool stuff and to make everything more reliable and it ends up just costing me a ton of work and $$. The drive guardians are a prime example. complete waste of time and money. Now I`m stuck with $7000 paperweights. Now that I think about it ...Do I have any recourse? I bought a product that did not work, why should I be the one left holding the bag? |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4848938)
I`m also not crazy about how much weight there is top of the intake and how high above the intake it is.
To me it`s asking a lot from the intake bolts. Naaaaaahhhh. |
Originally Posted by ICDEDPPL
(Post 4848938)
I`m also not crazy about how much weight there is top of the intake and how high above the intake it is.
To me it`s asking a lot from the intake bolts. sometimes I try to do cool stuff and to make everything more reliable and it ends up just costing me a ton of work and $$. The drive guardians are a prime example. complete waste of time and money. Now I`m stuck with $7000 paperweights. Now that I think about it ...Do I have any recourse? I bought a product that did not work, why should I be the one left holding the bag? What happened with the drive guardians?? |
|
Wow,, I run them in my 46OL with no issues for 6 years now. Looks like the torque spring was set to close to your actual torque numbers your engines make
|
Originally Posted by 47EXCALIBUR
(Post 4849236)
Wow,, I run them in my 46OL with no issues for 6 years now. Looks like the torque spring was set to close to your actual torque numbers your engines make
I wanted to get some kind of compromise but since Mike now ignores me it`s time to contact a lawyer. |
Them Ausies do some cool stuff. I like how there`s no need for fuel rails. Pretty trick. $3200 , I`m not spending that but they are nice .
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...174fc0a904.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...8352d3bccd.jpg https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...644c4dc6b7.jpg https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...118f9c8ebb.jpg https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...d908d0f291.jpg https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.off...e07e269619.jpg |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.