Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
496HO Down on power >

496HO Down on power

Notices

496HO Down on power

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-21-2022, 03:21 PM
  #271  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,549
Received 799 Likes on 446 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrFeelgood
They have to be added in a location prior to where water mixes with the exhaust gas. Something like this, for example:
https://affordable-fuel-injection.co...adapter-plate/
DrFeelgood,

Merc 496 Exhaust Assembly

So, where in this diagram would that unit go? I have an idea, but I’d like confirmation.

I’m assuming the water from the distribution tube goes into a jacket around the actual exhaust passage of the manifold, and is then introduced to the exhaust flow through the two hoses on either side of the base of the riser elbow….?

Also, since the 555 ECM doesn’t have provision for O2 data input, this addition would only be for test and tune purposes, then the sensor port would be plugged, right?

Assuming the additional height can be accounted for in the flexibility of the exhaust hose between the riser and the transom tubes….?

Also assuming it would be best to have these installed on both sides….?

Thanks. Brad.
(937)546-8991
Brad Christy is online now  
Old 08-21-2022, 03:45 PM
  #272  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 1,302
Received 971 Likes on 441 Posts
Default

You could permanently install a wideband O2 sensor with a gauge at the helm, if you wish to monitor on an ongoing basis. Doing both sides seems most logical but I'm sure there's some guys out there that arbitrarily just picked one side.

The stock manifold setup uses a wet joint at the manifold to riser joint. Most aftermarket setups eliminate that wet joint in favor of a jumper hose. In either event, there is no water in the exhaust gas stream at that point, it's just a matter of how cooling water gets from the outer cooling jacket of the manifold, to the outer cooling jacket of the riser.

DrFeelgood is offline  
Old 08-21-2022, 04:21 PM
  #273  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,549
Received 799 Likes on 446 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrFeelgood
You could permanently install a wideband O2 sensor with a gauge at the helm, if you wish to monitor on an ongoing basis. Doing both sides seems most logical but I'm sure there's some guys out there that arbitrarily just picked one side.

The stock manifold setup uses a wet joint at the manifold to riser joint. Most aftermarket setups eliminate that wet joint in favor of a jumper hose. In either event, there is no water in the exhaust gas stream at that point, it's just a matter of how cooling water gets from the outer cooling jacket of the manifold, to the outer cooling jacket of the riser.
DrFeelgood,

So it would go between the manifold and #15?

I wouldn’t be opposed to adding a couple O2 gages, just to monitor them, but I wouldn’t feel the need for them. I’m far more concerned with potential damage to those damned cast pistons if I’m running lean, but I also don’t want to be running overly rich, either. The transom soot is bad enough.

Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991
Brad Christy is online now  
Old 08-21-2022, 07:07 PM
  #274  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 1,302
Received 971 Likes on 441 Posts
Default

Based on that diagram, it looks like there's a dry joint with jumper hoses. Maybe Merc revised that with the 496, I don't know.

At any rate, 1 is the manifold and 7 is the riser. Ideally an O2 would go either in between those with an adapter plate, or in a bung welded into the riser.
DrFeelgood is offline  
Old 08-21-2022, 10:34 PM
  #275  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,564
Received 1,824 Likes on 909 Posts
Default

496 exhaust is a dry joint from manifold to riser.
You could still use a plate between them or you could have a bunge welded in where the #7 is.
Griff is offline  
The following users liked this post:
articfriends (08-22-2022)
Old 08-22-2022, 08:11 AM
  #276  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,549
Received 799 Likes on 446 Posts
Default

Guys,

Looking at IAC valves. Any reason not to buy the Sierra unit instead of the Quicksilver unit?

Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991
Brad Christy is online now  
Old 08-22-2022, 08:29 AM
  #277  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,550
Received 3,117 Likes on 1,403 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brad Christy
Guys,

Looking at IAC valves. Any reason not to buy the Sierra unit instead of the Quicksilver unit?

Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991
Get the ford motocraft one. Do a search, we have deciphered the part #.
SB is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by SB:
cheech (08-22-2022), Ryan00TJ (08-22-2022)
Old 08-22-2022, 10:23 AM
  #278  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,550
Received 3,117 Likes on 1,403 Posts
Default

Here is one such thread:
496 mag exact iac valve
SB is offline  
Old 08-22-2022, 10:51 AM
  #279  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,549
Received 799 Likes on 446 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
Here is one such thread:
496 mag exact iac valve
SB,



Done did it. 😎

Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991
Brad Christy is online now  
The following users liked this post:
Ryan00TJ (08-22-2022)
Old 09-19-2022, 06:59 AM
  #280  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 1,549
Received 799 Likes on 446 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brad Christy
SB,



Done did it. 😎

Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991
SB,

Finally got a chance to get the scan tool out and play with it a bit. I performed the IAC output test and got ZERO change in RPM from -100% to +100%. I'm assuming this is an indicator the IAC valve is bad. Since I already had the replacement part on hand, I swapped it out, but have not had the chance to get it wet again and fire it up for a final evaluation. Is it safe to assume the hunting idle will have gone away?

Thanks. Brad.
(937)545-8991
Brad Christy is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.